Commentaire
This is not a productive use of the government of ontario's time. First, it is a gross overstep of Ontario's power over municipal authorities to impose that traffic control alterations be a matter of provincial review and approval.
Second, I see no indication that the premise of this bill is evidence-based. I feel uncomfortable that such a bill, that would have large implications on my sense of safety has not even implied an evidence base. I am a healthcare worker - i do not breathe without checking to make sure the practice is evidence-informed.
It seems like common sense that allowing cyclists to feel safe commuting every day by giving them some minute protections inspires more cyclists. It also decreases the bicycle skill threshold necessary to commute safely, so that less confindent cyclists may still use their bike to commute. I just moved to College St, and i have been so impressed with the number and variety of cyclist commuters and couriers with whom i share the lane.
Toronto's bike lanes give rise to its's food courier culture, which i have never seen so prevalent before. While i do not use any food courier services, i love that this industry is so well-supported by the infrastructure provided by toronto municipal government.
Soumis le 17 novembre 2024 8:26 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
116487
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire