Commentaire
This is not a good idea. It refuses to appeal to data and research, or the urban planning of great livable cities, in order to garner votes from a base that refuses to shift habits. Congestion is bad in the city - because the city has catered to cars and there are just too many people driving. This will not change meaningfully until there are feasible alternatives. These bike lanes were a great step in the right direction, and people depend on them. They have been gaining popularity - it takes time for people to shift habits as they see a more feasible option than a car.
This is just a bad way to politicize an issue, and alienate voters. Especially voters who would've probably voted for Doug in the next provincials but now will reconsider.
Cycling is the best way around the city; it is sustainable and affordable. It gives people independence and let's them enjoy the city to its fullest. Cars plug things up and make cities less accessible. Doug, why not leave a better legacy, and keep working to make Toronto more liveable.
Soumis le 18 novembre 2024 6:57 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117131
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire