Commentaire
The proposed legislation appears to promote the use of automobiles as a primary means of transportation to the potential detriment of others modes such as cycling. As a driver and cyclist it is my opinion that cyclists need a dedicated lane on busier roads for cyclist's safety and for the safe sharing of roads between these two modes of transport.
Replacing bike lanes with automative lane as proposed will force motorists and cyclists to share the same lanes, which may increase the risk of collision with cyclists, who are much more vulnerable. Furthermore sharing these lanes with cyclists may force cars to slow down which appears to be counter to the stated goal of reducing gridlock and reduced environmental impact.
I am curious on which studies and recommendations this proposed legislation is based upon? Has any consideration been made that replacing bike lanes with auto lanes may increase congestion by encouraging more automobiles to use the roads?
I am also concerned the province is attempting to increase it's jurisdiction over municipalities which may have a better understanding of their traffic patterns and characteristics and have appropriate solutions to reduce traffic congestion while balancing the needs of various modes of transport.
Soumis le 18 novembre 2024 9:17 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117233
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire