This bill is based on non…

This bill is based on non-existent data and hearsay. There have been widespread studies that state we should be building more cycling and public transit infrastructure to support our growing population. Induced demand for highway & roadway infrastructure is real and has been studied multiple times over. The bill says it aims to reduce gridlock. Why is the province going against, what should be, common knowledge? The premier is making outrageous claims and they are being debunked by the media with regards to this bill. It's very clear the path that we need to go down for us to achieve our desired common goals of reducing our carbon footprint while improving the economy.