Commentaire
I am writing as a resident of Toronto, Ontario to express my opposition to the Government of Ontario's proposed amendment to the HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT.
Specifically, I ask that the government reconsider and remove the the proposed change to require Ministry approval before municipalities may construct bicycle lanes in certain circumstances, and to require municipalities to provide the Ministry with information, including information relating to bicycle lanes.
I am deeply concerned about Bill 212 on the following grounds:
1. Health and Safety: cyclists on the road in large cities are vulnerable and at risk. This year alone, five cyclists have been killed so far in Toronto — more than any other year since police started keeping such records in 2006. As the province recognizes that accidents and lane closures can worsen traffic congestion and impact the quality of life of Ontarians, I fail to understand how the removal of protections for vulnerable persons on the roads will aid in meeting the stated goal of reducing congestion. Removal of bike lanes will only result in more accidents and deaths, and the evidence demonstrates this fact. Prioritizing the health, safety, and wellbeing should be a key priority of the provincial government. I am deeply disappointed to see that the elected representatives in this province are not taking this seriously.
2. Environmental impact: As we see the increasingly devastating impact of climate change and a warming planet it is disheartening, disappointing, and impractical for the government to take actions that will only discourage Ontario residents from opting to take low and zero carbon modes of travel.
3. Economic cost: Removal of existing bike lanes is a waste of time and taxpayer money which will only result in more unnecessary disruption to traffic flows.
4. Infringement of the province on municipal matters: The Ontario government should focus on matters of provincial concern such as health and education and allow the elected representatives at the local level to make decisions that fall under their purview.
In summary, I am deeply disappointed to see my elected government proposing these changes that will not support the health, wellbeing, and quality of life of their constituents, and ask that Bill 212 does not go forward as presented.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 5:40 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118364
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire