Commentaire
Anything politicians say or do is recorded for history and will be part of their legacy as they will not be able to change it. Facts and transparency matter as facts and criteria have not been provided to justify the removal of any bike lanes nor any criteria with regards to how to prove that the removal of bike lanes actually get more cars moving along with eliminating any traffic congestions. One can argue that it is discriminatory to favour cars over bikes and others which use the bike lanes as not only bikes use the bike lane. Knowing the number of people riding bikes murdered this year alone shows the governments approval of outright murder by removing any bike lanes. Using the notwithstanding clause on everything people don't agree with the government does is not the way governments are suppose to work. Courts will say that the notwithstanding clause does not allow governments to legalize murder. Doing anything just to get re-elected will not change what history will show of how week leaders act.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 6:20 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118484
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire