Commentaire
Bill 212 is not rooted in the facts about transportation and planning. For a lifetime conservative voter like me, it is important the government stands on the side of reason, not emotion, and take a look at information for what it is. It is fiscally irresponsible for the government to invest millions of dollars into biking infrastructure, only to rip it up only a few years later. The cost estimates may indeed be inaccurate, but even a dollar more spent on this issue is too much because these lanes are already in the ground. It has been reported that only 1.2% of Ontarians use these lanes. I don't disagree with this. But not every Ontarian lives in Toronto! Not every Ontarian lives near a good bike lane! But a lot of Torontonians do. Why encroach on someone else's way of life for the sake of someone else's?
Whether we like it or not, Toronto's population is growing rapidly. An extra 2 lanes on Yonge, Bloor, or University might help gridlock now, but what happens in a few years when there's even more drivers on the road? We can't build more lanes on to these roads, so why don't we work to a more permanent solution so people can enjoy their bikes and others can enjoy their cars?
I don't know why logical person would go ahead with a plan like this. Ford is losing out on common-sense guys like me.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 8:13 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118742
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire