As a resident of Toronto and…

As a resident of Toronto and a student of urbanism, I urge you to reconsider the provisions in Bill 212 that may lead to the removal of bike lanes in our city. This measure jeopardizes the safety and well-being of some of our most vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, delivery workers, and underprivileged groups, who rely on cycling as a safe and affordable mode of transportation.
The following Key Points on Bike Safety and the Importance of Dedicated Bike Lanes explain why:
- Safety for All Ages, Especially Children
Dedicated bike lanes provide a safe space for children to commute to school or recreational activities without the risk of sharing lanes with high-speed vehicle traffic. Studies consistently show that separated cycling infrastructure significantly reduces accidents and injuries, creating a safer environment for families. Removing bike lanes forces young cyclists into more dangerous conditions, potentially deterring families from choosing active transportation.
-Protection Through Traffic Separation
Research demonstrates that physically separated bike lanes—those with barriers or buffers—are vital for reducing collisions and increasing cyclist confidence. Without these lanes, cyclists, especially children, face increased vulnerability in shared spaces with motor vehicles. Retaining these lanes is crucial to prevent avoidable injuries and fatalities.
- Encouraging Safe and Equitable Transportation Options
Bike lanes are not just for recreational use; they serve as essential infrastructure for economically disadvantaged groups who may rely on bicycles as their primary mode of transportation. Removing bike lanes undermines these individuals' ability to travel safely and equitably, widening social and economic disparities.
-Data Supporting Bike Lane Effectiveness
Cities with robust bike lane networks consistently report fewer cyclist injuries and fatalities. Investments in such infrastructure are proven to enhance public safety and encourage more residents to adopt cycling, leading to healthier and more sustainable communities.
-Creating a Livable, Family-Friendly City
Toronto has made strides in fostering a more inclusive and accessible urban environment. Removing bike lanes is a step backward, sending a message that safety and sustainability are not priorities. Instead, maintaining and expanding cycling infrastructure aligns with our shared goals of reducing congestion, promoting environmental responsibility, and enhancing quality of life for all residents.

I strongly encourage the committee to prioritize the safety and needs of our communities by retaining and improving the city's bike lanes. Let us build a Toronto that is safe, sustainable, and accessible for all, especially our most vulnerable residents.

Thank you

References :

Dill, J. (2009). Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30(S1), S95–S110.

Tilahun, N. Y., Levinson, D. M., & Krizek, K. J. (2007). Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(4), 287–301.

Bachand-Marleau, J., Lee, B. H. Y., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2012). Towards a better understanding of the factors influencing the likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use. Transportation Research Record, 2314(1), 66–71.

Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2013). Four types of cyclists? Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential. Transportation Research Record, 2387(1), 129–138.