Commentaire
I've been cycling to work for the past 14 years. Over that time, I have felt more and more safe as the cycling network has been expanded and more separated lanes have been installed.
I cycle because I think it is the most rational way to get to work. It avoids car congestion as well as cramped rush hour subway rides. I am in control of my schedule, it gives me more freedom. I am a senior executive at my company, I am well respected, a subject matter expert in my field. Cycling is not a children's toy, it is a legitimate commuting method, one that is a necessary part of a growing city. If every cyclist actually used their car, the traffic would be so much worse.
I continue to cycle despite the terrifying near misses with cars and the belligerent, dangerous, behaviour of some drivers on the road towards me and other cyclists. There are also many very courteous drivers who treat me with respect and care on the road. I also belong on our roads. I pay taxes for the roads. I deserve to have a direct, safe way to get to work and to my other activities.
I strongly, deeply oppose Bill 212. It will make me and other vulnerable road users less safe while doing nothing to ease car congestion in the city. Bike lanes are not the problem, they are the solution to easing traffic. The more appealing you make cycling, the more accessible, less scary, the more people will consider it as a legitimate alternative to transportation and get out of their cars (often as single occupancy) to get around the city.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 8:54 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
119470
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire