Ontario as a whole has not…

Ontario as a whole has not done enough to protect bikers. Bike lanes provide alternate modes of transportation for a diverse province such as Ontario. More cyclists mean fewer cars on the road, which can lead to less congestion. This can also contribute to shorter travel times for motorists; therefore, the premise of this bill is incorrect and misleading.

Removing bike lanes reduces safety. They provide a dedicated space for cyclists which helps to reduce conflicts and potential accidents with motorized vehicles; therefore, bike lanes increase safety for both cyclists and motorists. Tax payer money has already been spent on these projects and the lanes are already successfully being utilized and have become part of many people's daily lives. This proves that bike lanes are essential for a mixed transportation hub such as Toronto.

Removing bikes lanes and adding unnecessary red tape is a deterrent for cities looking for ways to improve the quality of life and health of the general population. Moreover, this bill will make it more difficult for cities to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality.

There are many economic benefits of bike lanes. Bike lanes can have positive economic impacts on local businesses. Cyclists tend to shop more locally, and bike lanes make areas more accessible, this can lead to increased foot (and wheel) traffic; thus, providing economic benefits for local businesses. In the long term, maintaining bike lanes is generally less expensive than the wear and tear caused by motor vehicles on roadways, which can lead to cost savings for the city. Lastly, cities with well-developed cycling infrastructures are often viewed as more progressive and attractive to tourists and potential residents.

Removing bike lanes can negate these positive benefits and send a signal that Ontario does not prioritize sustainable and healthy transportation choices, potentially contributing to negative outcomes across safety, environmental, social, and economic aspects. Municipalities do not need interference from the Ontario government in improving their cities.