I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my firm opposition to the proposed interim changes to the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA), and the introduction of the Species Conservation Act, 2025. While the government asserts that these changes aim to streamline processes and reduce delays for critical infrastructure projects, the proposed amendments pose significant risks to Ontario's biodiversity and the integrity of our environmental protections.

Weakening Habitat Protection

The proposal to reduce habitat protections from 20 to 10 years undermines the species' survival prospects. This diminishment of habitat security could lead to irreversible ecological consequences, especially in areas like the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, where the majority of the population resides. Similarly, the elimination of mandatory waiting periods for health assessments before development activities increases the risk of harm to endangered species.

Expansion of Exemptions for Development Activities

The introduction of a Species at Risk Conservation Trust, allowing developers to pay fees to offset environmental impacts, effectively permits the destruction of critical habitats. This "pay-to-slay" mechanism does not guarantee the restoration of lost ecosystems and may lead to further declines in biodiversity.

Undermining Scientific Oversight

The proposed changes to the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO) could dilute the scientific rigour of species assessments by introducing non-scientific members. This shift may prioritize development interests over evidence-based conservation efforts, compromising the effectiveness of species protection strategies.

Inadequate Enforcement and Monitoring

The expansion of exemptions for early mineral exploration, coupled with the ministry's historical challenges in enforcement and monitoring, raises concerns about the cumulative impacts on species at risk. Without robust oversight, these activities could lead to significant and unmitigated environmental degradation.

Conclusion

The proposed amendments prioritize short-term development goals over long-term ecological sustainability. In the face of a global biodiversity crisis, Ontario must strengthen, not weaken, its commitment to protecting species at risk. I urge the government to reconsider these proposals and uphold the integrity of the ESA to ensure a healthy and resilient environment for future generations.