Commentaire
I do not support your proposal for Bill 66.
It is disturbing to me that the Ontario government under Doug Ford would try dismember the Acts that were put in place to protect the human health of our communities and ensure that the water we drink is safe and the environment is protected for our and future generations.
Section 5 comment:
I do not support your proposal to repeal the Toxics Reduction Act. This Act was put in place so industrial facilities which use toxic chemicals in their processes would be pressured to swap them out for less toxic alternatives. This is very important to me as a resident of Hamilton. Toxic chemical emitters like the steel industry and chemical industries should be kept in check by provincial government and its Ministry of Environment because without it they will do nothing for the health of the surrounding community, being private companies, to them only the bottom line matters. It is only because of the Toxics Reduction Act, Ministry orders and pressure from the community that the Hamilton airshed is getting better with time. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still the worst airshed in Ontario but we’re seeing slow improvements in our community. Doug Ford, you are taking away the people’s right to clean air and water. Come and visit the industrial area in Hamilton where the two steel mills and supporting industries sit. This is how things were done 100 years ago, where industrial growth trumped human health and the environment. We don't want these situations for other communities. The impacts to the Hamilton and Burlington has been high with increased cancer rates and toxic waste in our bay.
Section 10 comment:
Your proposal for “Open-for-business by-laws” is unnecessary and redundant. There is no “red tape” which is stopping businesses from opening up shop in Ontario. Every city has designated areas for industry and plans for growth. There is no need from the province to meddle in city affairs when it comes to city planning. The biggest problem I see in your proposal for Section 10 is the huge environmental impacts it will have on our human population and wildlife. The Clean Water Act was put in place for a reason. Do you think having another Walkerton crisis is a good idea? Your so called “red tape” protects human lives by ensuring we have clean, safe water sources in Ontario and vulnerable ares in our beautiful province are protected. Keep your hands off our Greenbelt Plan, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Lake Simcoe Protection Plan, Provincial Policy Statement under the Planning Act and the Clean Water Act. The only “red tape” you’re removing is the obstacles for your Developer buddies who want to build on prime farmland and download the costs onto the cities. We know you wanted to open up the Greenbelt for them and backed off with the public outcry. Don’t think we, the people, don’t see what you’re doing.
This proposal undermines efforts to make Ontario communities more livable, sustainable and resilient. Your “Open for business by-laws” would override existing Provincial Policy Statements under the Planning Act that support active transportation, green infrastructure, affordable housing and climate resiliency. That is just irresponsible and wrong.
What I find even more alarming is that this proposal for Bill 66 would compromise transparency and public engagement. Contrary to currant legal requirements your “open-for-business by-laws” could be passed without any prior public notice, behind closed doors. This would leave communities without recourse. This would take away the voice of those living in Ontario communities. There would be no appeal options left for us. We live in our cities and should have a say in what is proposed because not all elected officials represent the whole constituency.
Section 3 comment:
Removing restrictions on home-based child care providers could endanger the lives of children. Yes, it will open up more child-care spaces but at what cost? Children, especially very small children should be given constant attention and care, how will you ensure that the person taking care of 6 children can handle them all and ensure their safety?
Overall, this bill will do more harm than good for Ontarians. It would lead us in the wrong direction. Don’t download important matters of human health and protection onto the cities, they are overwhelmed as is.
Soumis le 20 janvier 2019 12:46 PM
Commentaire sur
Projet de loi 66 : Loi de 2018 sur la restauration de la capacité concurrentielle de l’Ontario
Numéro du REO
013-4293
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
20272
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire