Commentaire
One of the biggest challenges we see is the Code is interpreted differently depending on the examiner even within the same municipality. We would like to see consistency so we can properly consult our clients. We believe Building Code should be clear and defined and not up to interpretation, even if we must follow more rigorous or strict Code guidelines. This should help to mitigate many of the questions and hold ups we currently see at the permit office as we currently find it difficult to consult with some municipalities when they have questions with our permit drawings. In some municipalities we are able to have a consultation prior to submission, and we find this to be very beneficial and efficient; but not all municipalities do this. We would like to see this as standard practice across Ontario.
There should be more training and better testing for BCIN, and continuing education is a must. Communication about building code changes at this time is unsatisfactory.
We were advised at the meeting in Vaughan that several ideas (other than Service Delivery by an Administrative Authority) were being contemplated, and that one of those ideas was looking at the BC model. As ONLY architects can apply for permit in BC, it eliminates non-architectural firms or persons from being able to operate independently. Interior designers will have no autonomy in terms of professional ability with commercial projects. This does not align with the OPEN FOR BUSINESS government mandate.
Before anything is implemented, the ideas for change should go under public review so that it can be refined to benefit the masses and not the few.
Soumis le 25 novembre 2019 12:10 PM
Commentaire sur
Transformation et modernisation de la prestation des services relatifs au Code du bâtiment de l’Ontario
Numéro du REO
019-0422
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
36748
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire