Commentaire
As a Registered Professional Forester in Ontario I am writing to you today to express overwhelming support for proposal ERO# 019-1020. Given that the current regulation under the ESA expires this year, I ask that this proposal be approved and finalized as soon as possible. There can be no further delay on this item.
My support for these changes is contingent on the finalized language containing no additional conditions, restrictions, or requirements, beyond what is already contained within the CFSA or O. Reg. 242/08 under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). While removing this duplication is a critical and essential first step, species at risk prescriptions contained within existing forest management guidance continues to limit access to a renewable and sustainable supply of timber. The CFSA in the Ontario framework provides a more balanced approach to sustainability and to species protection (including species at risk) as it does not manager for an individual species at the expense of others, but instead manages for all species at once across the landscape.
The CFSA already provides landscape, stand, and site-level direction for managing, conserving, and protecting species at risk. Having two acts attempting to accomplish the same outcome represents the single greatest piece of red tape and duplication to this sector. While a permanent, legislative change to the CFSA is an essential and important first step, in order to unleash the full potential of the sector, improvements need to be made to forest management guidance (e.g. landscape guides and the Forest Management Guide for Conserving Biodiversity at the Stand and Site Scales) delivered under the CFSA.
I understand that MNRF is currently undertaking a review of forest management guidance and manuals and expect the finalized products to:
1. Consider the impacts of climate change on species at risk habitat.
2. Evaluate the cumulative impacts of species at risk policy on a healthy economy.
3. Contribute to functioning ecosystems and working landscapes.
4. Undertake, share, and consider socio-economic impact analysis.
.
Sincerely,
Feedback Signature signed Anonymously to allow for publication
Soumis le 17 janvier 2020 11:22 AM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi de 1994 sur la durabilité des forêts de la Couronne
Numéro du REO
019-1020
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
40404
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire