Commentaire
The link below does great job of articulating my feelings on this topic.
Additionally, i'll add and/or emphasize the following:
1. There's plenty of land available already to meet these building needs, you don't ned to go afterbthe greenbelt.
2. "sprawl" is fantastically inefficient way to provide housing. Build up, not out.
3. There can be no other logical conclusion other than your government is doing huge favour to developers. In fact, it looks like a quid pro quo and should be illegal.
Lastly, Ford and other government members have repeatedly
said that then greenbelt would never be touched and have now reversed your promise. 50,000 homes out of 1,5000,000 is a rounding error and can absolutely be accommodated without stealing from the greenbelt.
Don't do it!!!! Please.
Soumis le 4 décembre 2022 5:55 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure
Numéro du REO
019-6216
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
78910
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire