SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS PARTNERSHIP - Approval for variance from the Liquid Fuels Handling Code

Instrument type: Approval for variance from the Liquid Fuels Handling Code

ERO number
019-2758
Ministry reference number
SR 2962440
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Technical Standards & Safety Act, 2000
Posted by
Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA)
Notice stage
Decision
Decision posted
Comment period
November 25, 2020 - December 25, 2020 (30 days) Closed
Last updated

This consultation was open from:
November 25, 2020
to December 25, 2020

Decision summary

The variance has been approved.

Location details

Site address

300 106TH ST; MISSION ISLAND
THUNDER BAY, ON
P7B 6T9
Canada

Site location details

bulk plant

Site location map

The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.

View this location on a map opens link in a new window

Proponent(s)

SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS PARTNERSHIP
300 106TH ST; MISSION ISLAND
THUNDER BAY, ON
P7B 6T9
Canada

Decision details

Suncor has been granted a variance to 

  1. To build the proposed new tank (TK-01) in the same location as the previous TK-01, which was located 25 metres from the Mission River; and
  2. Not to submit an environmental assessment following the removal of tanks TK-01, TK-03, and TK-04.

Suncor shall continue the semi-annual monitoring (headspace vapour readings, depth to groundwater, presence or absence of liquid petroleum hydrocarbon) and annual sampling of the three monitoring wells BH5, BH6 and BH7 for the laboratory analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) and petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) fractions F1-F4.

The contaminant management plan (CMP) reports are to be submitted to MECP as per the current CMP in place for the site.

Comments received

Through the registry

0

By email

0

By mail

0
View comments submitted through the registry

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

How to Appeal

This instrument decision can be appealed. You have 15 days from January 4, 2021 to begin the appeal process.

Carefully review the information below to learn more about the appeal process.

How to appealClick to Expand Accordion

If you’re an Ontario resident, you can start the process to appeal this instrument decision.

First, you’ll need to seek leave (i.e. get permission) from the relevant appellate body to appeal the decision.

If the appellate body grants leave, the appeal itself will follow.

Seek leave to appeal

To seek leave to appeal, you need to do these three things:

  1. prepare your application
  2. provide notice to the minister
  3. mail your application to three parties

1. Prepare your application

You’ll need to prepare an application. You may wish to include the following things in your application:

  1. A document that includes:
    • your name, phone number, fax number (if any), and/or email address
    • the ERO number and ministry reference number (located on this page)
    • a statement about whether you are a resident in Ontario
    • your interest in the decision, and any facts you want taken into account in deciding whether you have an interest in the decision
    • the parts of the instrument that you’re challenging
    • whether the decision could result in significant harm to the environment
    • the reason(s) why you believe that no reasonable person – having regard to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind – could have made the decision
    • the grounds (facts) you’ll be using to appeal
    • the outcome you’d like to see
  2. A copy of the instrument (approval, permit, order) that you you are seeking leave to appeal. You’ll find this in the decision notice on the Environmental Registry
  3. Copies of all supporting documents, facts and evidence that you’ll be using to appeal
What is considered

The appeal body will consider the following two questions in deciding whether to grant you leave to appeal:

  1. is there is good reason to believe that no reasonable person, with respect to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind, could have made the decision?
  2. could the decision you wish to appeal result in significant harm to the environment?

2. Provide your notice

You’ll need to provide notice to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks that you’re seeking leave to appeal.

In your notice, please include a brief description of the:

  • decision that you wish to appeal
  • grounds for granting leave to appeal

You can provide notice by email at minister.mecp@ontario.ca or by mail at:

College Park 5th Floor, 777 Bay St.
Toronto, ON 
M7A 2J3

3. Mail your application

You’ll need to mail your application that you prepared in step #1 to each of these three parties:

  • appellate body
  • issuing authority (the ministry official who issued the instrument)
  • proponent (the company or individual to whom the instrument was issued)


Proponent(s)

SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS PARTNERSHIP
300 106TH ST; MISSION ISLAND
THUNDER BAY, ON
P7B 6T9
Canada


Appellate body

The Registrar
Divisional Court (Toronto Region)
130 Queen Street West
Osgoode Hall - Room 174
Toronto 
M5H 2N5 
Phone: (416) 327-5100 
Fax: (416) 327-5549


Include the following:

ERO number
019-2758
Ministry reference number
SR 2962440

This is not legal advice. Please refer to the Environmental Bill of Rights for exact legal requirements. Consult a lawyer if you need help with the appeal process.

Connect with us

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice

Original proposal

ERO number
019-2758
Ministry reference number
SR 2962440
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Technical Standards & Safety Act, 2000
Posted by
Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA)
Proposal posted

Comment period

November 25, 2020 - December 25, 2020 (30 days)

Proposal details

Please note items numbered 1 and 2, respectively, correspond to the numbered items under each subheading.

Liquid Fuels Handling Code (LFHC) Requirements that Would Not be Met:

1. 3.2.1.4. Aboveground storage tanks shall be installed, (c) except at marinas, not less than 30 metres from a waterway.

2. 8.2.6. Where tanks, piping, or dispensers of an aboveground storage tank system with an individual tank capacity greater than 5,000 litres have been removed or replaced and the property continues to maintain fuel storage equipment or tank systems, the owner or operator of the facility, the owner or operator of the storage tank systems, or the owner of the property on which the equipment is installed, as the case may be, shall submit an assessment report to TSSA that delineates the full extent of any petroleum product that has escaped from the tanks, piping, and dispensers, into the environment or inside a building both on site and, where necessary and practical, off site.


Reasons Why Code Would Not Be Met:

  1. The new TK-01 tank will be located at the same location as the previous TK-01 to maximize the utilization of the existing infrastructure. This in turn will minimize the disturbances caused by construction to the site (which is an active and operating facility).
  • The foundation for the previous TK-01 can be built up to accommodate the new larger size tank without constructing new. (This greatly reduces the extent of earth work and excavation, which is a major consideration since the tank is located within an existing active and operating tank farm.)
  • Facility/Equipment sizing (i.e. pipes, pumps) will remain as is. Existing piping and pumps can be re-used without modifications.
  • Inlet and outlet piping are existing and can be re-connected and re-used for the new tank.
  • Associated steel support structures (for piping, cables/cable tray) are existing and can be re-used.
  1. The new TK-01 will be located within an engineered containment dike that continues to be in use following the removal of the aboveground storage tanks (TK-01, TK-03, and TK-04). Soil sample collections will involve excavation which will compromise the integrity of the tank farm. To maintain the integrity of the dike, Suncor would prefer not to submit an environmental report, which requires soil sample collections.
     

Safety Issues Addressed by Code:

  1. Provides a buffer zone to capture any leaks/spills before they enter the waterway.
  2. Identifies and remediates any contamination that may have leaked from the tanks.

 

Equivalent Safety Methods to Mitigate Abovementioned Issues:

1. Distance from the River:

  • The tank will be located within a clay dike that has a permeability of 5 x 10-9 cm/s (which exceeds the 10-6 cm/s impermeability requirement of the LFHC) and has an available containment capacity (27ML) that is more than 1.5 times the LFHC required containment capacity (16ML).
  • In addition to the clay dike, TK-1 will have an additional liner (Enviro liner 6040 by Layfield) on the underside of the tank which will provide tertiary containment.
  • In addition to the independent overfill protection device specified by the LFHC, the new TK-01 will have an additional continuous automatic level monitoring system which provides real-time level readings in the tank and informs Operations of any abnormalities.
  • Suncor has adopted the disciplined approach of American Petroleum Institute (API) Standard 2350 for Overfill Protection for Storage Tanks in Petroleum Facilities. Suncor’s Corporate practice for overfill prevention in Distribution Terminals is highly conservative and involves multiple layers of alarms/warnings and manual/automated corrective actions before reaching the overfill condition.
  • The proposed tank TK-1 will exceed the design requirements of API 650 (the standard that covers the minimum requirements for design, manufacture, installation, materials and inspection of aboveground vertical cylindrical tanks, without refrigeration, with open or closed roof, built with welded steel plates):
    • Suncor specified higher-quality steel plates.
    • Tank bottom and shell plates were specified with greater thickness than required by API.
    • Shell vertical joints are seamless, full penetration welds which result in stronger welds and overall better structural integrity.
    • Welding electrodes specified by Suncor on bottom joints provide stronger welds and higher resistance to corrosion and environmental factors.
    • Suncor specified higher corrosion allowance on all internal shell, bottom and wetted structural components.
    • Suncor specified design-specific gravity of the liquid stored shall be minimum 1.0 (equivalent to water), and the design liquid level higher than the API requirement. This translates to a more robust tank structure than a typical API tank.
  • The tank side sampling system is equipped with self-closing valves with spring return handles (deadman valve). This feature ensures no escape of tank contents during sampling operations.
  • Leak detection program – Suncor’s Terminal Operations department performs monthly visual monitoring of the surface of the groundwater in each of the leak detection groundwater monitoring wells, within the tank farm, for the presence of floating, free-phase hydrocarbon or sheen. In addition, there is semi-annual groundwater monitoring and annual groundwater sampling by a certified environmental consultant. Both programs are intended to provide early warning/indication of a potential breach. These programs allow Suncor to take corrective action to remove/eliminate the concern in advance of a potential failure.

 

2. No Environmental Report

  • Semi-Annual Monitoring and Annual Sampling Program

There is an environmental groundwater monitoring and management program for the Thunder Bay Terminal. This program involves semi-annual groundwater monitoring and annual groundwater sampling by a certified environmental consultant, which includes headspace vapour concentration readings, water level measurement and determination of liquid-phase petroleum hydrocarbon detection.

As part of the Thunder Bay Terminal environmental groundwater monitoring and management program, there are numerous groundwater monitoring wells located within the Terminal property. Suncor has identified three (3) monitoring wells that are relevant to this Variance application.

  • One (1) monitoring well (BH7) is located between TK-01 and TK-02, inside the tank farm.
  • One (1) monitoring well (BH5) is located south-east of TK-04, outside the tank farm, along the shoreline.
  • One (1) monitoring well (BH6) is located south-east of TK-01, outside the tank farm, along the shoreline.

The 2020 Groundwater Sampling Report prepared by TERRAPEX Environmental, dated October 30, 2020, shows that the benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) and petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) fractions’ F1-F4 levels fall within the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Table 9 Site Condition (Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 metres of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition). There are no impacts in the groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells.

 

  • Leak Detection Program

A leak detection program is in place at the Thunder Bay Terminal where Terminal Operations perform monthly visual surveying / monitoring of the surface of the groundwater in each of the leak detection groundwater monitoring wells, within the tank farm, for the presence of floating, free-phase hydrocarbon or sheen, using a dedicated clear bailer. In addition, Terminal Operations also conduct visual inspection of the monitoring wells to assess their condition and potential need for repairs/upgrades.

 

  • Tank Floor Condition of Demolished Tanks

TK-01, 03, 04 were emptied, cleaned, and removed from service permanently on the following dates:

  • TK-01: out of service since September 13, 2005
  • TK-03: out of service since September 28, 2019
  • TK-04: out of service since September 28, 2006

The tanks were never returned to service from the above dates and were demolished in October 2019.

TK-01, 03, 04 all had internal epoxy coating applied on the tank floor, which provided additional corrosion protection.

The final API 653 (the standard that covers the inspection, repair, alteration, and reconstruction of steel aboveground storage tanks used in the petroleum and chemical industries) out-of-service inspection report for each tank detailing the floor condition of each tank was summarized in Attachment 7. It was evident from the inspection reports that no tank contents had escaped TK-01, 03 and 04, as the floor, shell, and welds were all intact. Despite the age of the tanks, no through-holes developed from internal and/or external corrosion factors.

In addition to the inspection records of the tanks, there were no reported leaks or spills from TK-01, 03 and 04 known to Suncor.

 

 

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

This consultation was open from November 25, 2020
to December 25, 2020

Connect with us