Ontario’s Greenbelt protects farmland, communities, forests, wetlands and watersheds. It also preserves cultural heritage and supports recreation and tourism in Ontario’s Greater Golden Horseshoe.
Read more
Ontario’s Greenbelt protects farmland, communities, forests, wetlands and watersheds. It also preserves cultural heritage and supports recreation and tourism in Ontario’s Greater Golden Horseshoe.
Read more
Urban boundary expansion was a topic that we the people already voted on, and voted against. What the provincial government is doing directly opposes the will of the people, the people that you are supposed to represent.
Read more
What an extremely stupid and short sighted idea this is. Focus on improving the function of cities that already exist and build them up. Increase density of existing cities.
Read more
Why even bother adding areas to the greenbelt? They won't just be removed later when it suits you? Like workers rights, these protections either exist or they don't. Changing the rules mid-game and overriding protections makes the entire system a sham.
Read more
I do not support this proposal to remove parcels (or any part) of the Greenbelt. By definition, this is permanently protected environmentally-sensitive land. I do not accept that it is necessary to develop the proposed parcels of land in order to achieve the goal of building more homes faster.
Read more
Getting rid of more Greenbelt space and conversations goes against everything we care about. We need high density, not more houses. Density improves public transportation efficiency and lowers costs. It increases revenues and creates jobs.
Read more
These farmlands have been protected since 1975.
The answer is NO to developers who only look to profit from these.
Wild life and farm lands should continue to be protected
It is important to build more affordable housing for the growing Ontario population, but this should not be done by bulldozing over the natural habitat of our land. More dense housing, middle housing to be exact, should be pursued over laying out hundreds of inefficient single-family homes.
Read more
It is absolutely irresponsible to even consider this plan. I do not support any changes to the Greenbelt. We need to preserve wetlands, biodiversity, and farm land.
Read more
Has the government read the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force report?
Minister Clark received a letter detailing how existing land can be developed to higher densities. There is no need to develop protected lands with single family homes.
The greenbelt needs to stay. We all value our greenspaces, our trails and provincial parks, and our farmland. The greenbelt needs to stay protected. There should not be a highway or huge developments going through it.
Read more
There is no reason to build in the greenbelt, your own experts created a plan for densification in the GTA. Please focus on creating walkable communities with good public transit infrastructure.
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Ontario’s Greenbelt protects…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64542
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Build UP, NOT OUT, urban…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64543
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Ontario’s Greenbelt protects…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64544
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Urban boundary expansion was…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64545
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Not only did this government…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64548
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
What an extremely stupid and…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64549
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Why even bother adding areas…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64550
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Greenbelt should be…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64551
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I do not support this…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64552
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Dear reader, We should not…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64553
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Getting rid of more…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64554
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
These farmlands have been…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64555
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
It is important to build…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64556
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
It is absolutely…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64557
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
More densification in cities…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64558
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Has the government read the…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64559
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The greenbelt needs to stay…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64560
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I stronger oppose the usage…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64561
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is no reason to build…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64562
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
THEY PAVED PARADISE AND PUT…
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
Comment ID
64563
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions