Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

99050

Commenting on behalf of

City of Guelph

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback regarding zoning by-law provisions related to the development of additional residential units. Attached are the City's responses to the discussion questions provided by the Ministry. Read more

Comment ID

99068

Commenting on behalf of

Food, Health and Consumer Products of Canada

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached a submission from Food, Health and Consumer Products of Canada regarding Bill 185. Read more

Comment ID

99069

Commenting on behalf of

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on Removing Barriers for Additional Residential Units (ERO 019-8366 / 24-MMAH011). Read more

Comment ID

99074

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals (OAHP)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals has prepared a detailed response attached to this submission. Read more

Comment ID

99080

Commenting on behalf of

Conservation Ontario

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached Conservation Ontario's comments on three ERO proposals associated with Bill 185, the proposed Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024: Read more

Comment ID

99086

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Additional Dwelling Units are an important step forward in building more housing stock for both the rental and home ownership markets. Read more

Comment ID

99098

Commenting on behalf of

Mondelez Canada Inc.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Mondelez Canada is a major employer, employing over 2,500 people across five manufacturing sites and two distribution facilities in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

99104

Commenting on behalf of

City of St. Catharines

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On April 10, 2024 the Province of Ontario released a package of proposed Provincial legislation with the announcement of the Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024 (Bill 185), proposing amendments to 15 Acts, including the Planning Act, Development Charges Act, and Municipal Act. Read more

Comment ID

99123

Commenting on behalf of

Tay Valley Township

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Are there specific zoning by-law barriers standards or requirements that frustrate the development of ARUs (e.g., maximum building height, minimum lot size, side and rear lot setbacks, lot coverage, maximum number of bedrooms permitted per lot, and angular plane requirements, etc.)? Read more

Comment ID

99145

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not pass this. It will allow developers to destroy natural areas like forests, fields, and wetlands, with very few consequences. Building homes is needed, but the UN says it can not be done at the cost of greenspace or wetlands. We need these natural areas as much as housing.

Comment ID

99146

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not pass this. It will allow developers to destroy natural areas like forests, fields, and wetlands, with very few consequences. Building homes is needed, but the UN says it can not be done at the cost of greenspace or wetlands. We need these natural areas as much as housing.

Comment ID

99155

Commenting on behalf of

Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
RE: ERO 019-8366 Please find attached letter submission on behalf of Brendan Browne, Director of Education, Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) Read more

Comment ID

99175

Commenting on behalf of

Suite Additions Inc.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are a design and consulting company, and have been dedicated to assisting homeowners in Ontario with over 400 additional residential unit (ARU) projects since 2016. Read more

Comment ID

99239

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Garden suites on corner lots should be treated line laneway homes and allowed to be up to 1700sqft and their height should be allowed to go beyond 6m since in these situations they would function like a detached house on the side street.