This development is wrong and there is no thoughtful planning put into it. Complete communities are not created with an isolated island of high density residential, surrounded by an employment area and adjacent to a 400-series Highway.
Read more
I oppose the development of two 32 storey and two 35 storey at Hwy 400 and Langstaff. This is being proposed with the Minister's Zonng Order: without any studies, public input or chance of appeals.
Read more
June 7, 2023
Dear Premier Ford, Minister Calandra, Minister Tibollo
Ontario Government, Queens Park
Honourable Gentlemen,
Re: Opposition of Battcorp development application 661 & 681 Chrysler Rd, Vaughan
Read more
Hw7 & 400 cooridor is wear high rise development is supposed to occur and transit infrastructure has been put in place. Development should focus on hwy 7 to increase the use of the transit put in place.
Read more
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of four high-rise towers near Langstaff and the Highway 400 onramp. This development raises significant concerns, and I urge you to reconsider the approval granted through a Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO).
Read more
There is absolutely no logical reason for this development to be build. Absolutely everything is wrong with this.
-no proper studies done
-no current infrastructure present
-no residential area close by
-no amenities
- will not add to our current housing crisis
Read more
As a home owner living beside Langstaff and Hwy 400 I vehemently oppose the construction of high rise buildings (or similar) in the area. This area is already highly congested and thus construction will make it significantly worse.
Read more
I am a resident of Woodbridge (Rutherford and Weston neighbourhood) since 2001. As per Ontario Environment registration, MZO's are to be used for urgent decisions. the four 32+ storey apartment buildings being pushed through for development at Langstaff and Hwy. 400 are a disaster in the making.
Read more
This letter is in response to the consideration of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (the “Minister”) to make a Minister’s Zoning Order pursuant to section 47(1) of the Planning Act (an “MZO”) respecting the proposed development application submitted by Battcorp Holdings (Vaughan) Ltd.
Read more
Foremost, Langstaff is very congested, in particular during the work week. Adding high density residential developments will lead to horrible traffic gridlock and effect everyone living in this area. Traffic movement needs to be studied.
Read more
From my basic understanding of urban planning. The idea is to keep commercial/industrial properties next to highways where there is a constant requirement for trucking to service manufacturers, distributors, and commercial businesses.
Read more
I oppose this for environmental concerns- pollution while building, traffic concerns for number of people, population density (too many people in a small area). I also oppose as it is not visually appealing to the community.
Read more
I’m writing to express concerns regarding the use of the Community Infrastructure and Housing Accelerator (CIHA) File CIHA.23.002 for
Battcorp Holdings (Vaughan) Ltd. and Battcorp II Holdings (Vaughan) Ltd.
Read more
Langstaff is presently a deadend street which ends at Islington Ave. to the west and Creditstone Road to the right. As a result, the area around Langstaff and the Highway 400 is already heavily congested.
Read more
It should be noted that the Region of York rightly opposes this proposal, highlighting that placing high-density residential units amid employment zones creates an isolated community. This area lacks essential residential amenities such as schools, community facilities, and walkable destinations.
Read more
Inappropriate Use of MZO
Vaughan has designated areas for intensification that are more suitable for mixed-use projects. Utilizing an MZO for this
specific site bypasses the established planning framework, undermining strategic urban development plans. A mixed-use
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
The traffic in Woodbridge is…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99701
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This development is wrong…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99702
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
No apartments at this site !…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99703
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose the development of…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99704
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
June 7, 2023 Dear Premier…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99705
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Hw7 & 400 cooridor is wear…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99706
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am writing to express my…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99707
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is absolutely no…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99708
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
As a home owner living…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99710
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am a resident of…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99711
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This letter is in response…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99713
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please stop ruining Vaughan…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99714
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Foremost, Langstaff is very…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99717
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
From my basic understanding…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99719
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
My family has been here in…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99721
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose this for…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99726
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I’m writing to express…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99728
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Langstaff is presently a…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99730
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
It should be noted that the…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99731
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Inappropriate Use of MZO…
Comment on
Ontario Regulation 326/24 – Zoning Order in the City of Vaughan
Comment ID
99732
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions