Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

99647

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While I understand the need for expediency in certain planning matters, exempting Minister's Zoning Orders (MZO) from the Environmental Bill of Rights Act, 1993 undermines the crucial principle of public consultation. Read more

Comment ID

99649

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We moved 15 years ago to the South/West corner of Weston/Langstaff with the understanding that the closest Highrise would be built along the HW7 corridor. Now 4 towers are being approved right @ the Langstaff HW400 southbound onramp. YIKES!!! Read more

Comment ID

99653

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Not requiring a study on the impact these buildings will have on the infrastructure and the community shows a lack of understanding of your accountability to your constituents. Traffic is already ridiculous and this will make it unbearable.

Comment ID

99657

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the irresponsible use of a provincial MZO to approve this proposal. The only winner will be the landowner. We the residents, will be left with the consequences of poor planning. This site is not in a planned intensification area. Read more

Comment ID

99659

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the irresponsible use of a provincial MZO to approve this proposal. The only winner will be the landowner. We the residents, will be left with the consequences of poor planning. This site is not in a planned intensification area. Read more

Comment ID

99660

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Our area has been accepting a lot of new zoning with condos and homes being made here. We request that this zoning not be approved as we want to continue to keep our community safe and not have any problems. We are a safe community and do not wish to have that changed.

Comment ID

99661

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Interference with Highway 400 Onramp The proposed development abuts the Highway 400 onramp, potentially interfering with this critical infrastructure. Ensuring safe and efficient access to the highway is paramount, and any development that threatens this should be carefully scrutinized.

Comment ID

99663

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Municipal Servicing Concerns The city’s Urban Water Plan has not accounted for the servicing needs of this high-density proposal. Proceeding without necessary studies and plans could result in inadequate municipal services, impacting both new and existing residents.

Comment ID

99666

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Upward Pressure on Land Values High-density residential development can drive up land values, which may deter new businesses from setting up in the area. This could hinder economic growth and job creation, counteracting the intended benefits of employment zones.