Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

108137

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The third paragraph under "What we are proposing" should be replaced by:: Municipal projects that have reached the construction stage or contracts have been awarded in advance of the framework coming into effect would NOT be exempt from provincial approvals. Read more

Comment ID

108144

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As an individual who has travelled extensively through Europe, I have seen the importance of Bike Lanes to improving pollution and individual fitness. More importantly, the research shows that within 2-3 years after a new highway lane has been constructed, gridlock returns to it's previous levels. Read more

Comment ID

108149

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I use all three of these bike lanes regularly. This will make me less safe, more likely to drive, and slow down my commute. Stop pandering for cheap votes using things that are proven to be exclusively negative. Read more

Comment ID

108150

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This CANNOT happen. Bike lanes are an essential part of tens of thousands of Torontonians' commute every day. More would take bikes if there was MORE investment in building safer bike lanes. How does shoving bikers onto the road, or forcing those bikers to drive instead improve congestion???? Read more

Comment ID

108152

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the province's proposed plan to limited the construction of bike lanes in municipalities across Ontario and remove existing lanes in Toronto. Read more

Comment ID

108153

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How much taxpayer money will go to removing these bike lanes, used by thousands of riders every day? Which study did the government use to inform and justify the decision to do so? How will road safety be impacted, by all road users? What do the BIAs think of this maneuver? Read more

Comment ID

108155

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 212’s framing of bike lanes as a cause of traffic congestion is misleading and appears to be an attempt to sow division rather than address the real causes of gridlock. Read more

Comment ID

108156

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hi again, I’ve commented on the previous bill or whatever this is. You clearly have no consideration for people who live within the city. Or people of Lower income who rely on biking and safe sidewalks to move through their neighbourhoods. Read more

Comment ID

108157

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a joke, right? Is there seriously legislation being pushed through that is intended to remove bike lanes that have already been built in the city of Toronto? Read more

Comment ID

108158

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is rooted in ill-informed decision-making. Removing already existing bike lanes is a waste of taxpayer dollars and goes against logic. Cyclists will always exist and removing bike lanes will not stop people from cycling on main streets. Read more

Comment ID

108159

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I forgot to mention in my previous comment that I think that without clear answers to the previously submitted questions, I would say that this proposal is a waste of time, money, government resources, increases "red tape," and is based on no evidence. Read more