Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

111029

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is such a ridiculous waste of time and money. Such overreach by the province to determine what the local residents need or want. We need more bike lanes not less. More protective bike lanes. Not to waste money ripping out bike lanes that were just finished. Read more

Comment ID

111030

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a colossal waste of time and taxpayer money to rip out bike lanes that have already been installed. It's also massive overreach by the provincial government on what should be municipal issues (and which were decided on by Toronto city councillors). Read more

Comment ID

111032

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this proposal. 1. Removing existing bike lanes will waste tax money. 2. Removing bike lanes will not reduce traffic jams. 3. Removing bike lanes lets more people to drive. 4. Removing bike lanes will make bikers unsafe.

Comment ID

111034

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill will increase gridlock and waste time and millions of dollars. The only solution to traffic is viable alternatives to driving. Making cycling less safe in order to make space for a handful more drivers on the roads is nonsense. Read more

Comment ID

111036

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am extremely disappointed to see bill 212 proposed by the ministry of transportation. The bill is a display of critical misunderstandings regarding the benefits and impacts of bike infrastructure in major Canadian cities. Read more

Comment ID

111038

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Municipal roads should be the responsibility of the Municipality. This includes how they plan to use it whether they want to add speed bumps, traffic calming measures, bike lanes or increase/narrow the width. Read more

Comment ID

111039

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing bike lanes will just create more congestion, accidents with bikes, and of course bad for the environment. Why would we go backwards when other progressive cities are actively adding more bike lanes??

Comment ID

111041

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I bike to work regularly and University, Bloor and Bay are essential corridors to get to where I need to easily. Cycling is a fantastic commute option as it is environment friendly, provides great exercise and is better for congestion than having everyone drive in cars. Read more

Comment ID

111042

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This new policy on bike lanes is counterproductive. One new lane of cars doesn't fix traffic. This has been proven over and over since Robert Moses kept promising fixes in NYC in the '30s. Read more

Comment ID

111043

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As someone who often drives around Toronto, I do no support removing bike lanes, especially on important corridors such as Bloor, University and Yonge. Driving with cyclists mixed in with regular car traffic is stressful and scary for all parties involved, and makes driving more difficult. Read more

Comment ID

111044

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I use the bike lane on university regularly to commute to work and the bloor home semi-regularly. Removing them would make me meaningfully less safe and would cause me to drive more for short trips in the city.

Comment ID

111045

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Even when there were two lanes the traffic was bad. Cars create traffic they are stuck in, but bikes, walking, and transit can reduce by allowing people to not need to drive. Those that may have biked are now going have to drive, thus adding to traffic, not removing. Read more

Comment ID

111047

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is a terrible decision. The number of cyclists is only low because of the poor average quality of bike infrastructure across the network. Looking at the rest of the world, it's obvious that bike infrastructure will be used heavily if it's well connected and high quality. Read more

Comment ID

111051

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this bill. The people of their municipalities paid for the lanes, now everyone has to pay to take them out. Just for some time in the future, I'm betting we will pay to put them back. The point of conservatives is to not spend money like liberals. Read more

Comment ID

111052

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a resident of Bloor West Village and avid cyclist, I have enjoyed the addition of the bike lanes along Bloor in the West End. However, there is ZERO need for bike lanes from South Kingsway/Jane, west to Islington (and beyond). The usage of those bike lanes is vanishingly small. Read more