Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

117096

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I’m vehemently against the removal of bike lanes in Toronto, especially from Bloor St. Less cars on the road = less traffic delays and less carbon/gas emissions. Adding more road construction when the city is already overwhelmed with it makes zero sense. Read more

Comment ID

117097

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This plan by the current government is one of the dumbest ideas yet. The Ontario government should ONLY in municipal operations/policies when there is the threat of fraud or total mismanagement. This issue does NOT come close to that. Read more

Comment ID

117099

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose this legislation. Not only will it do nothing to address traffic congestion in the City of Toronto (https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7358319), this is manifestly an issue for the City of Toronto, not the Province, to decide on. Read more

Comment ID

117100

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Seems to me removing bike lanes that are already in place would be a huge waste of time and tax dollars, not to mention disruption of traffic during removal. Maybe, just concentrate on future projects, instead of interfering with what’s already in place.

Comment ID

117102

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very concerned that the removal of bike lanes will endanger the lives of innocent pedestrians. It's generally men who are cyclists, food delivery guys and idiot male e-scooter riders who currently ride on the sidewalks where there are no bike lanes. Read more

Comment ID

117104

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the Ontario government's bill to usurp authority over bike lanes. This is a wholly inappropriate subversion of local democracy,and decisions made by the democratically elected city council. Read more

Comment ID

117106

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please keep current bike lanes and work with communities/municipalities for all proposed and future ones. These bike lanes are crucial to keep traffic flowing and provide a number of benefits, such as: Read more

Comment ID

117109

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need as many bike lanes as possible in this city, to keep all cyclists SAFE, including our CHILDREN and families who want to travel the city with minimal environmental impact!!!! More traffic lanes just encourages more traffic!

Comment ID

117110

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against this bill 212. Bike lanes are important for the environment, promoting the use of bicycles instead of cars. Global warming is happening and allowing more cars to drive in a city is not a solution. Read more

Comment ID

117112

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bike lanes under question are frequently used by myself to commute to work (high-park area to downtown), and to travel throughout the city. They have been an huge benefit to myself and the thousands of new cyclists that use them. Read more

Comment ID

117115

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Your proposal stinks for two reasons: 1) it is an uncalled-for interference in local affairs and local democracy; and 2) it's basic premise is not based in fact or evidence. Read more