Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

119554

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bill as framed is harmful to transportation efficiency, safety, and fiscal responsibility. These harmful elements include: Increased Traffic Congestion: By discouraging cycling as an alternative mode of transport, the bill could lead to more cars on the road and greater congestion. Read more

Comment ID

119555

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I agree with removing bike lanes on major thoroughfares. In particular the Yonge St ones. How are emergency vehicles to get by when there is only one lane of traffic each way. Don’t whatever you do have an emergency during rush hour!! Read more

Comment ID

119558

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I see grid-locked traffic on all the streets regardless of whether there is a bike lane. So clearly it is NOT the bike lanes that are the cause of increased congestion. The source is that there are too many cars and the majority of the cars have only 1 occupant. Read more

Comment ID

119559

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Data has shown the bike lanes make a positive difference. It is safer, and more fluid for traffic. Tearing them out will cause more construction. Thr parking is on the outside of the lane, which makes getting hit by car doors less likely. Read more

Comment ID

119560

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My daughter is a professional cyclist who has represented Canada on the national team for years. She just quit at only 22 years of age and despite being Canada's top ranked domestic pro racer and I couldn't be more relieved. The greatest catalyst was the impossibility of training in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

119562

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lanes help to protect my life, the lives of my family and friends, and help toronto to be a vibrant and efficient city. We need more bike lane protections not less.

Comment ID

119563

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a cyclist who relies on the wonderful bike lanes throughout the city, particularly on Bloor, to commute safely, quickly and in an economical and ecologically sound way to and from work every day. Read more

Comment ID

119564

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
- In dense urban areas, cars are limited by space they take up - a 3.5m wide lane can only carry 1500-2000 people per hour. To reduce grid lock, we have to shift the amount of space allocated to cars to other modes of transport. (see TUMI link). Read more

Comment ID

119565

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The removal of bike lanes is going to be a waste of time/money and overall a detriment to the city. I urge the Ontario government to use their resources on something else that will help benefit the province, not just Toronto.

Comment ID

119567

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This may be the worst idea any government in Ontario has ever had. I am deeply opposed to this potential waste of money and gross overreach into municipal jurisdiction. Read more

Comment ID

119568

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel it is a waste of time and money to remove the already standing bike lanes; just don’t build any more on those major arteries and focus on providing future bike lanes on alternative adjacent roads in the future. Read more

Comment ID

119569

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill and what it suggests is unhinged. The words “safety” and “health” do not appear anywhere in the bike lane sections of Bill 212, and the only consideration to approve or remove bike lanes would be “the orderly movement of motor vehicle traffic”. Read more

Comment ID

119570

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a suburban voter. I believe it is important to protect all users of the roads, including cyclists. The removal of infrastructure prior to actually evaluating its impact seems short sighted at best. Read more

Comment ID

119571

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 212's provision requiring provincial approval of municipal bike lane installation and permitting the province to remove bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue in Toronto is wrong for many reasons: Read more

Comment ID

119573

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a poorly thought-out proposal. Bike lanes within a city are municipal jurisdiction. Quite hypocritical of the premier to want to remove bike lanes when he has previously commented on the usefulness and safety of them. Read more

Comment ID

119574

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You're putting millions of biker in danger by removing dedicated lanes where they have safe access to travel. We are suffering from a climate crisis and you want to add more cars to the road? Why mot invest in a high speed monorail? Read more