Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

23867

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am dismayed that it seems necessary to remind you, the government, of the original purpose of the ESA: 1. To identify species at risk based on the best available scientific information, including information obtained from community knowledge and aboriginal traditional knowledge. Read more

Comment ID

23870

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I am strongly opposed to the Government of Ontario's proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act. What we need is greater protection of endangered and threatened species, not less. Read more

Comment ID

23872

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While these changes look OK from a surface level, I'm concerned that they are hiding the fact that they will be making it easier for economic opportunities to bypass the rules protecting endangered species! Legislation restricting developers would provide a better long-term plan for Ontario.

Comment ID

23874

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need to create a review that puts endangered species first. Since 2013, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry has watered down the ESA. The Crown Forestry Sustainability Act does not go far enough to protect species. Read more

Comment ID

23875

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to see new development done without disruption of mature trees. Inspections done for any species of risk to loss of habitat . Time responding should be immediate when a sighting is reported . Land must be protected immediately. Read more

Comment ID

23881

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Generally, the basic intent of many (not all but many) of the proposals in the discussion paper is clearly, or can reasonably be seen to be, aimed at making it easier for the ministry, businesses such as logging and mining, and and other property owners such as resort developers, to advance their ec Read more

Comment ID

23882

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please reconsider this. In the last 45 years we have murdered 60% of the world's wildlife. We need to conserve what we have left. What will happen when the rest goes, humanity will go to Don't be that government who adds to it. Be the catalyst for change in the right direction. Read more

Comment ID

23887

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The endangered animals and habitats of Ontario cannot be assessed by a singular, uniform process. The ways in which they interact with their environment is singular and individual and the process used to assess projects that would impact them should also reflect this. Read more