Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

15305

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have concerns that rushing through development proposals will be at the expense of environmental and safety issues. There is a process in place for these things to ensure that new development will respect current environmental and safety regulations that help protect our planet and our people. Read more

Comment ID

15320

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to this proposal. Greenbelt and other protected lands are resources that help sustain communities. They contain water sources and major carbon-capture resources - trees. These lands have been protected for very valid reasons. Read more

Comment ID

15391

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this new regulation. Our environmental resources with our green belts and farms cannot be restored once destroyed. Our migratory birds and many other animals rely on this stretch of land to survive. Read more

Comment ID

15395

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a short sighted proposal. If we loosen environmental protection bringing about inadvertent contamination of the environment the costs will be exponentially greater than the benefit of any business that is attracted in the short term. Read more

Comment ID

15445

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
By allowing the Planning Departments more freedom to build in green spaces, they are disregarding environmental issues which will affect volume and water quality. This will also open up industrialization that will negatively affect the ground environment and emissions concerning air quality. Read more

Comment ID

15595

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that that this regulation should not go through under that Planning Act. As a master of planning student, I believe we have to protect our environmentally sensitive areas from development such as Ontario's Greenbelt and Oak Ridges Moraine. Read more

Comment ID

15712

Commenting on behalf of

Kitchener-Waterloo Climate Save

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is not about being open for business. This is about being open for pollution and being open to not undergoing the proper environmental reviews. Don't open Ontario for more pollution. We can no longer afford to allow businesses and corporations to destroy the planet. Read more

Comment ID

15722

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposal is the thin end of a wedge. While apparently business friendly and somewhat benign in its wording, it has potential to be exploited to undermine the Greenbelt provisions. The Greenbelt is something Ontarians should be proud of and should be sacrosanct.

Comment ID

15914

Commenting on behalf of

Kitchener-Waterloo Climate Save

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are appalled that the provincial government is even considering legislation that would weaken environmental guidelines that we so desperately need in this day and age. We are appalled that the government is putting our collective future at risk. This is never okay and it never will be. Read more

Comment ID

16058

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal appears to contravene good planning principles which ensure that all use is balanced. How will the tool protect environmentally sensitive areas and open space? How will it interact with the proposed removal of regulations for toxics reduction? Read more

Comment ID

16147

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Rural Townships and their villages are in critical need of business growth and related job creation so in general the Ontario Governments initiatives to attract and encourage business and create jobs in Ontario are laudable. Read more

Comment ID

16214

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please dont allow this bill to pass. It is essential for the protections to remain in place. Bill 66 will mean a loss in jobs for regulatory staff and consultants who complete the required studies prior to development. Read more