Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

20663

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Why would the Ford government ever think that the people, the citizenry that they were elected to represent, would desire loosening regulations on wireless providers, overtime pay, and the dumping of toxic materials. In what world is that to our benefit? Read more

Comment ID

20664

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While the government should continue to explore ways to encourage healthy business investment and cut unnecessary regulations, this Bill actually cuts regulations that are essential for the long term economic growth of our Province and the wellbeing of its people. Read more

Comment ID

20666

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against Bill 66. The regulations it is against are not "unnecessary", they are the opposite. In a time where environmental issues are more important than ever we should not be making such regressive moves. We need these acts in order to protect our lakes, clean water, and ecosystems. Read more

Comment ID

20670

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Provincial and municipal data show there is enough land already available in our towns and cities for our housing needs up to 2041. There is also a surplus of land for new businesses and we should be encouraging investment in these areas. Read more

Comment ID

20680

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Doug Ford promised to protect the Greenbelt during his campaign, after the uproar caused by his suggestions of opening it up for development. We cannot continue to just accept that politicians lie. He must be held accountable for this promise.

Comment ID

20692

Commenting on behalf of

Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Alliance

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
January 20, 2019 Mr. Ken Peterson Provincial Planning Policy Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay St. 13th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 Dear Mr. Peterson Re: Response to Request for Comments Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act 2018 (ERO #013-4293) Read more

Comment ID

20695

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to schedule 10 of Bill 66 and I urge the government to delete it. I feel strongly that the provisions of this schedule 10 of this Bill are detrimental to our environment, land use planning and the democratic process that we depend on in Ontario to maintain our quality of life. Read more