Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

29918

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Its a step in the right direction. If all hunters used common sense we could eliminate the need for any minimum distance restriction but as that is not the case, I believe most hunters can live with the proposed direction

Comment ID

29929

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel it's a good idea to shorten the length of how far from roads or buildings. It' also very important to keep the spring bear hunt as it helps to keep the number of bears in check. Baiting is also important as it gives hunters longer to make sure it's a male and not a sow with cubs.

Comment ID

29937

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think that the proposed changes make sense. The spring bear hunt is an important tool in wildlife management and proper baiting contributes greatly to that end. With this past winter having such an impact on moose and deer populations, the spring bear hunt is needed more than ever. Read more

Comment ID

30069

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a waterfowl, small game and big game hunter in Southern Ontario, this proposal is a step in the right direction but still places too many burdens on hunters without providing hard data evidence that bait placement restrictions for black bear are necessary. Read more

Comment ID

30142

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I agree wholeheartedly with the proposed change from 200m to 30m. It is a reasonable and common sense change, and will get the agreement and respect deserved from all (most) hunters and conservationists. Thank you.

Comment ID

30152

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think this is a great amendment. The current rules of 200m from rights of ways and trails can make it a challenge for hunters, both to access baits and recover animals, especially for young, elderly or those with reduced/impaired mobility. Read more

Comment ID

30373

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
A proposal to reduce the setback from roads and trails to 30m (from 200m). As a hunter this is a good idea for the safe hunting and harvesting of black bears. Thank you for working towards this change.

Comment ID

30390

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I commend the government for responding to concerns regarding the unnecessary setback of 200 meters from roads, right of ways, trails etc. This original setback was not supported by factual evidence. Read more

Comment ID

30392

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against moving baiting limits closer to trails and roadways, which will increase the number of bears killed and the probability of accidents including pet dogs attracted to baits.

Comment ID

30393

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is cartoonish ignorance. Pets will be hurt or killed so easily with this change. Humans will be hurt. I don't even agree with bears being baited since that's a barbaric practice but putting the traps 30 metres from a trail is shortsighted.

Comment ID

30474

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The existing guidelines for bear hunting and baiting ought not to be altered. Public safety is of the utmost importance and I expect the Ministry to continue to make that a priority.

Comment ID

30475

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are significantly more recreationalists such as bird watchers, hikers, dog walkers, photographers, geocachers, and families than hunters or outfitters in the province, many of whom are unfamiliar with hunting and firearm safety protocols who may be put at risk as a result of this move. Read more