Ontario Regulation 416/19 – Revocation of Minister’s Zoning Orders in Northern Ontario

The following 21 site-specific Minister’s Zoning Orders (MZOs) in northern Ontario have been revoked. Revoking these orders will create a less complex regulatory environment and remove inconsistencies for land owners in unincorporated territories. The following MZOs have been revoked, listed by district.

Cochrane District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 15/94 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Keefer (Unincorporated) described as lots 1-19 on Plan 6M-461.

Ontario Regulation 174/93 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Clute (Unincorporated) being part of Lot 23 in Concession IX, described as lots 1-6 on Plan 6M-459, lots 7-16 on Plan 6M-464 and lots 17-29 on Plan 6M-468.

Kenora District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 213/96 applies to lands on Harbour Island, Sand Lake described as lots 1-7 on Plan 23M-910 in unsurveyed territories in the District of Kenora (Unincorporated).

Ontario Regulation 323/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Cathcart (Unincorporated) described as part 1 on Plan 23R-4034.

Ontario Regulation 364/95 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Kirkup (Unincorporated) described as parcel 14855 on Plan 23R-9351 and parcel 33676 on Plan 23R-9351.

Ontario Regulation 411/91 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Kirkup (Unincorporated) described as part 1 on Plan 23R-4726.

Ontario Regulation 450/95 applies to lands described as lots 1-17 on Plan 23M-905 and blocks 18-20 on Plan 23M-905 and parcel 39391 in the unorganized territories of the Lake of the Woods (Unincorporated).

Ontario Regulation 494/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Mutrie (Unincorporated) being south ½ of Lot 10 in Concession I, described as lots 1-13 on Plan 23M-887.

Ontario Regulation 641/94 applies to lands on Hare Island described as lots 1-11 on Plan 23M-897 and block 12 on Plan 23M-897 and parcel 39391 in the unorganized territories of the Lake of the Woods (Unincorporated).

Ontario Regulation 70/96 applies to lands described as parts 5, 7-9 on Plan 23R-6814 and part 100 on Plan 23R-5577 in unsurveyed territories in the District of Kenora (Patricia Portion) (Unincorporated).

Ontario Regulation 703/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Pellatt (Unincorporated) being part of Lot 13 in Concession VI, described as lots 1-16 and blocks 17-20 on Plan 23M-889.

Ontario Regulation 753/84 applies to lands on Dufresne Island in the Winnipeg River described as all lots and blocks on Plan M-832. The lands are now incorporated with the City of Kenora.

Ontario Regulation 82/94 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Pettypiece (Unincorporated) being south part of Lot 6 in Concession I, described as lots 1-7 and block 8 on Plan 23M-898.

Rainy River District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 488/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Watten (Unincorporated) described as lots 1-7 on Plan 48M-362.

Ontario Regulation 702/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Spohn (Unincorporated) being part of Lot 7 in Concession IX, described as lots 1-8 on Plan 48M-459.

Ontario Regulation 565/91 applies to lands described as lots 1-6 and blocks 7-9 on Plan 48M-361 on unsurveyed territories in the District of Rainy River (Unincorporated).

Sudbury District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 485/71 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Emo (Unincorporated) being Plan M943 and lands in the geographic Township of Strathearn (Unincorporated) being Plan M944.

Thunder Bay District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 360/95 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Upsala (Unincorporated) being part of Lot 2 in Concession I, described as lots 1-3 on Plan 55M-575.

Ontario Regulation 464/92 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Sibley (Unincorporated) being part of Lot 10 in Concession II, described as lots 1-14 on Plan 55M-543.

Ontario Regulation 670/05 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Ames (Unincorporated) described as lots 1-22 on Plan 55M-609 and block 13 on Plan M-395.

Timiskaming District Revocations:

Ontario Regulation 45/99 applies to lands in the geographic Township of Sharpe (Unincorporated) being lots 1-11 on Plan 54M-354.

The following Deeming Orders are hereby revoked:

Ontario Regulation 42/97 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Blind River and Suburban Planning Board. The planning board has since dissolved.

Ontario Regulation 211/02 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Municipality of Temagami. The municipality has since replaced their zoning by-law.

Ontario Regulation 41/97 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the West Nipissing Planning Board. The planning board has since dissolved.

Ontario Regulation 40/97 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Espanola and Area Planning Board. The planning board has since dissolved.

Ontario Regulation 572/98 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Geraldton and Suburban Planning Board. The planning board has since dissolved.

Ontario Regulation 104/11 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Smooth Rock Falls Planning Board. The planning board has since adopted a new zoning by-law under section 34 of the Planning Act.

Ontario Regulation 153/97 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Sudbury East Planning Board. The planning board has since adopted a new zoning by-law under section 34 of the Planning Act.

Ontario Regulation 161/98 deemed MZOs to be and always have been a zoning by-law of the Lakehead Rural Planning Board. The planning board has since adopted a new zoning by-law under section 34 of the Planning Act.

Other Information:

The government contact can be reached toll free at 1 800 461-1193 Ext. 46845.

Prior to a decision being made, a public notice was placed in local newspapers in both French and English. Majority of comments received were favorable to neutral in nature.

We want to inform you of this decision even though we are not required to under the Environmental Bill of Rights Act, 1993.