As a concerned citizen, there is major concerns with the Noise study, in particular with the fact that the proponent has not always been in compliance with MOE regulations.
Read more
ERO response – 019-1444 & 019-1446
This document is intended to be a response to an application for a renewable energy plant (Biogas / waste processing plant) at 633 Coronation Drive in Scarborough.
Read more
Unconventional gas development can affect local and regional air quality. The MECP summary and dispersion model states that CO2 emissions will exceed the Ministry's Limit by 300%.
Read more
My primary concern is there is existing, persistent noise coming from the current operations at 633 Coronation Drive, which has not been accounted for in this acoustics study submitted by the proponent 2683517 Ontario Inc. If approved, the two plants will be operating concurrently.
Read more
I am writing to you with a concern regarding my strong opposition to a request for an environmental approval for a very large biogas facility at 633 Coronation Drive in Scarborough.
Read more
We have two small children, and this type of plant does not belong in a residential area. We fear for their health based on the numbers we have seen.
nitrogen oxides (NOx) - up to 35% of ministry limit
sulphur dioxide (SO2) - up to 69% of ministry limit
Read more
In reviewing the latest noise assessment, a few items have been identified that are a concern to the overall application and are detailed below.
Latest ERO submission challenges the requirement for an EAA, the proponents
Read more
This study does not account for the noise of trucks arriving or leaving the facility. Also, the study does not account for the noise of backup alarms on vehicles on site, which can range up to 100 dPA.
Read more
This is a residential neighborhood with young families and children. The last thing it needs is more noise and heavy trucks rumbling along these small streets. There is already a sewage processing plant. This needs to be taken to a more appropriate area, NOT here is West Hill.
The operation of the facility over a 24 hour period causing noise, toxic gases and excess traffic in a community with several schools in all directions from the plant, a community centre and several elderly and young children is a high risk for breathing and health concerns as well as safety.
Read more
As a long time resident of Scarborough, and which resides within close proximity of the proposed facility, I certainly disagree and discourage this proposal.
Read more
We do not believe that this facility should be expanded to manage organics or any other waste. The traffic along with the CO2 emissions from the trucks and the plant itself will have invade our quiet residential neighbourhood. Please have the proponent reconsider this location.
I am one of the residents of this beau neighborhood which you are going to ruin by subjecting it to biochemical gasses, pollution, hideous sight, smell and noises of stinky trucks passing from its streets 24 hours a day! This is just an example of environmental racism and inequality.
Read more
We are very concerned with the impact of noise in our neighbourhood from all the trucks. We bought our home 8 years ago knowing the area was low traffic and quiet. Having 200 plus trucks coming through the neighbourhood in a 24 hour period via Coronation is simply unacceptable.
I am writing to you with a concern regarding my strong opposition to a request for an environmental approval for a very large biogas facility at 633 Coronation Drive in Scarborough.
Read more
From my perspective , the traffic study is flawed:
1. The study does not consider the size of the vehicles - ie regular passenger car vs solid waste collection truck / tractor trailer !!
2. A traffic study is irrelevant when you are using historical data that is 6 years old.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
As a concerned citizen,…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48652
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
ERO response – 019-1444 &…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48787
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Unconventional gas…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48790
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
633 Coronation Drive…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48792
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
It is irresponsible to…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48841
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
My primary concern is there…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48880
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am writing to you with a…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48900
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We have two small children,…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48903
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
In reviewing the latest…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48905
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This study does not account…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48917
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is a residential…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48929
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The operation of the…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48945
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
As a long time resident of…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48947
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
633 Coronation Drive…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48953
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We do not believe that this…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48956
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am one of the residents of…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48959
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We are very concerned with…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48960
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am writing to you with a…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48967
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am fully against a waste…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48971
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
From my perspective , the…
Comment on
2683517 Ontario Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (multiple media)
Comment ID
48974
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions