Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

58467

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Oakville should have the authority to decide how future development projects should be planned and implemented. New projects should be approved based on following parameters. 1- access to quality elementary and secondary education for resident families. Read more

Comment ID

58502

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Noise pollution of all sorts is a serious problem today. Much more needs to be done to decrease sources of noise and their loudness. Restricting hours of operation of noise-producing entities and decreasing the allowable number of decibels that an be produced by such entities is crucial. Read more

Comment ID

58511

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission with respect to ERO # 019-2346 (A Proposed Approach to Update the Projection Methodology Guideline). Thank you. Read more

Comment ID

58522

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The broad comment I have about the projection methodology is the length of time it should extend into the future. Other changes to planning projections for the GGHA have extended the window in which projections are to be made. Any updates to the planning projection window should be limited. Read more