Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

51124

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose the proposed expansion of powers that the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing is seeking. These are the principal reasons. 1) The consultation is coming too late. Read more

Comment ID

51127

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not think you should expand the powers of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to issue Ministry Zoning Orders that override municipal planning processes and opportunities for community voice. Ministry Zoning Orders should be used infrequently and not as general policy.

Comment ID

51128

Commenting on behalf of

County of Brant

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Council of the County of Brant would like to formally submit comments regarding changes to Section 47 in the Planning Act, R.S.O. Read more

Comment ID

51129

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly believe that the municipality and community for any development should be directly engaged in planning. The proposal to remove their involvement will only favour profits of developers, and will have a long lasting detrimental effect on the community. Read more

Comment ID

51130

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the City of Pickering, I am submitting the attached comments that were recently endorsed by Pickering Council (Resolution number 508/21) and the confirmatory by-law number is 7814/21. Formal correspondence will follow from the City Clerk. Read more

Comment ID

51131

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Rathnelly Area Residents Association is against expanding the province's power in this regard. Our area is absolutely overrun with development and we simply cannot handle any more. Read more

Comment ID

51132

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The description of the proposal sounds enticing. Using inclusionary zoning for badly needed affordable housing is a great idea. However, I cannot help but notice that several of the MZO's that have caught the attention of the public lately have negative consequences. Read more

Comment ID

51133

Commenting on behalf of

City of Kitchener

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The City of Kitchener’s submission addresses three components of the ERO Posting with respect to how MZOs should be used as a planning instrument; the application of MZOs on the site plan review process and the implications of MZOs as a tool to implement Inclusionary Zoning (IZ). Read more

Comment ID

51134

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
please, please, PLEASE DONT DO THIS!!! You can incorporate these buildings into a grand new development. Just please don't destroy history, PLEASE!!!

Comment ID

51135

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I disagree with the proposed changes as I think is a hindrance to the public. The community should be informed of the changes happening in the surrounding areas. The province should not have the power to make these amendments without informing the affected community/communities.

Comment ID

51136

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I wish to voice my strong opposition to this proposal, as I feel it only serves to further empower the province to ignore community engagement and operate without proper input. Read more

Comment ID

51137

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I wholly disagree with this Planning Act which intends to grant the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing the authority to override or zone any property in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

51138

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How dare you bypass proper local vetting. It is outrageous to impose your communist, dictator, like policies. History has plenty of examples of how this went wrong.

Comment ID

51140

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission in regards to ERO # 019-2811. Thank you. Read more

Comment ID

51142

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Subject: City of Burlington’s Comments on the proposed implementation of provisions in the Planning Act that provide the Minister enhanced authority to address certain matters as part of a zoning order: ERO Number 019-2811 Read more

Comment ID

51143

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Once again the is government is seizing control of local issues to allow development over good environmental, historical or moral stewardship. Shameful!

Comment ID

51145

Commenting on behalf of

National Farmers Union-Ontario

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Planning Consultation Provincial Planning Policy Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs 777 Bay Street 13th floor Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 January 29, 2021 Read more

Comment ID

51146

Commenting on behalf of

City of Mississauga

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see below comments prepared by the City of Mississauga. A link to the Corporate Report that was presented to the City's General Committee for endorsement has also been provided. Please refer to Items 5.2 and 9.13. Comments 1. Ministerial Zoning Orders should not be used routinely Read more