Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

55176

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose the Government's plan to burn wood pellets and biomass in order to produce electricity. Biomass is not a sustainable form of energy. Wood pellets are marketed as a clean energy alternative, but we know that wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Read more

Comment ID

55177

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is not a clean or green solution. It would require the destruction of more forests and create pollution equal to or greater than that of coal at the smokestack. You listened the science for COVID. I implore you to do the same for our climate crisis. Read more

Comment ID

55190

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bio Mas burning for electricity if it was plausible would only be short term jobs at most.no trees even scrub ones no animals no insects no breathing.and how about federal investment in company for LNG frac of gas billion dollars.and expect people to pay into the carbon tax scam seems you fi Read more

Comment ID

55196

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Stop expanding the wood pellet industry – it’s a false climate solution that is dirtier than coal at the smokestack! It's so hard to believe that this is even being considered while we face a climate crisis. It's not hard to see the faults of the forest biomass industry: Read more