GFL Environmental Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (waste)

Instrument type: Environmental Compliance Approval (waste)

ERO number
019-4458
Ministry reference number
6923-C6VGBC
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Notice stage
Decision
Decision posted
Comment period
October 14, 2021 - November 28, 2021 (45 days) Closed
Last updated

This consultation was open from:
October 14, 2021
to November 28, 2021

Decision summary

On September 18, 2022 we issued an amended Environmental Compliance Approval No. A210742 for the use and operation of a waste disposal site (processing/transfer) and Class 1 soil management site for management of excess soil limited to dry soil.

Location details

Site address

38 and 39 Fenmar Drive
Toronto, ON
Canada

Site location map

The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.

View this location on a map opens link in a new window

Proponent(s)

GFL Environmental Inc.
39 Fenmar Drive
Toronto, ON
M9L 1L9
Canada

Decision details

This approval is an amendment to the existing Environmental Compliance Approval (waste disposal site) No. A210742 for the use and operation of a waste disposal site (processing/transfer) and Class 1 soil management site for management of excess soil limited to dry soil and encompassing the following activities:

  • receipt and temporary storage of the dry soil, destined for bioremediation at the site, within the confines of two buildings
  • processing, including treatment, of the dry soil and consisting of the following processes and support units:
  • processing of the dry soil with a shaking/screening unit equipped with a bioaugmentation compound(s) injection system at the exit of the unit
  • addition of biostimulation compound(s) and amendment material(s) to the dry soil
  • transfer of the dry soil from the preparation areas to the biopile areas
  • perforated pipe-aerated bioremediation of the dry soil in up-to 10 biocells, or mechanically-aerated bioremediation of the dry soil in up-to 10 biopiles, located within the confines of 2 buildings
  • washing of contaminated rocks removed from the dry soil
  • transfer of the processed soil off-site
  • receipt and temporary storage of the dry soil, destined for transfer off-site
  • transfer of the dry soil off-site or screening and transfer of the dry soil off-site

This amendment is to increase the annual receipt rate from 405,600 tonnes per year to a maximum of 950,000 tonnes per year.

The site serves the Province of Ontario and operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

Comments received

Through the registry

0

By email

0

By mail

1
View comments submitted through the registry

Effects of consultation

Seven local businesses submitted a jointed submission listing the following concerns:

Concern about daily receipt rate increase

Ministry's response: The increase in the daily receipt rate was approved in the amended Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) dated August 11, 2022 as it was a part of that application. August 11, 2022-ECA included conditions to prevent and/or manage the following impacts from an increased daily receipt rate: traffic, fugitive dust and mud track-out. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same conditions.

Concern about soil storage increase

Ministry's response: The increase in the storage capacity was approved in the amended ECA dated August 11, 2022 as it was a part of that application. August 11, 2022-ECA included conditions to prevent and/or manage fugitive dust from the storage. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same conditions. Specific impacts of emissions to the atmosphere are regulated under the Air/Noise ECAs.

Concern about non-compliance with the regulatory requirements

Ministry's response: Enforcement of the existing regulatory requirements for the site is out of scope for the MECP technical review of this application. The MECP local district office is responsible for ensuring compliance with the regulatory requirements, including the conditions in the ECA.

Concern about lack of effective complaint management program

Ministry's response: August 11, 2022-ECA includes Condition 10 with specific instructions and requirements to establish a comprehensive complaints management program. This is a standard condition included in waste ECAs for sites with a potential for public complaints. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same conditions.

Concern about increased emissions

Ministry's response: Specific impacts of emissions to the atmosphere are regulated under the Air/Noise ECAs.

General preventative measures based on waste management practices to minimize fugitive emissions from the operations at the site and from the truck traffic to and from the site were included in August 11, 2022-waste ECA. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same following conditions:

  • Condition 4.14(2) includes a requirement to submit to the MECP a plan for performing negative pressure assessment for the soil buildings to identify ideal methodology for achieving and monitoring negative pressure in the buildings to contain the emissions in the buildings
  • Condition 9.1 includes specific instructions and requirements for dust management during soil handling activities in the soil buildings, including compliance with the Best Management Practices Plan (BMPP), and its subsequent versions, subject to the District Manager's instructions and/or concurrence
  • Condition 9.2 includes specific instructions and requirements to manage mud track-out from the site, including compliance with the BMPP, and its subsequent versions, subject to the district manager's instructions and/or concurrence
  • Condition 9.3 includes specific instructions and requirements to manage dust on municipal roads leading to the site, including compliance with the BMPP, and its subsequent versions, subject to the district manager's instructions and/or concurrence
  • Condition 9.4 includes specific instructions and requirements for covering of all vehicles entering, leaving and travelling in between the soil buildings to minimize the risk of soil spilling during transport
  • Condition 9.5 includes specific instructions and requirements for vehicles arriving at the site should be filled to have an appropriate freeboard to minimize the risk of soil spilling during transport

Concern about increased truck traffic and resulting impact on public safety, local businesses and the public roads

Ministry's response: August 11, 2022-ECA included conditions to minimize traffic impact on the community. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same following conditions:

  • Condition 9.6 prohibits queuing or parking of the soil trucks that are waiting to enter the site on any roadway that is not a distinct part of the site
  • Condition 9.6 also requires that a trained personnel is directing traffic on the municipal roadway in front of the site during the operating hours to ensure that there is no soil trucks queuing on the municipal roadway
  • Condition 9.6 also includes additional specific instructions and requirements to minimize truck traffic on the road and between the soil buildings

However a detailed review of the impact of the increase in truck traffic on public safety, local businesses and the public roads is out of scope for the MECP technical review of this application. The issues related to truck traffic and public safety are the municipal responsibility.

Concern about physical deterioration of the roads

Ministry's response: Assessment of deteriorating road conditions and road design is out of scope for the MECP technical review of this application. The issues related to road conditions are the municipal responsibility.

Concern about elimination of Low Temperature Thermal Desorption Unit

Ministry's response: The August 11, 2022 ECA excluded the low temperature thermal desorption unit that was initially approved in 1995 to thermally remediate contaminated soil. This equipment is a type of technology that can be used to remediate contaminated soil but the equipment has never been used at the site and GFL has no intention of ever using this technology at this location.

Concern about impact from soils from spills

Ministry's response: August 11, 2022-ECA approved receipt of impacted soils from emergency spills as it was a part of that application. August 11, 2022-ECA included conditions that the approved receipt of impacted soils from emergency spills is limited to non-hazardous waste category only and that the soil must be isolated from other soils until it is characterized. As all soil received at the site, the soil from spills will be contained in the soil buildings to minimize the risk to the local community. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA includes the same conditions.

Concern about inclusion of 38 and 39 Fenmar Drive locations in one ECA

Ministry's response: Inclusion of both soil buildings located at 38 and 39 Fenmar Drive locations in the site definition is within the interpretation of "site" definition in Regulation 347. The same types of operations are to be carried out in both buildings. August 11, 2022-ECA approves both properties as the site as it was a part of that application. The re-issued September 18, 2022-ECA is for the same site.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Client Services and Permissions Branch
Address

135 St Clair Ave West
1st Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1P5
Canada

Office phone number

How to Appeal

This instrument decision can be appealed. You have 15 days from September 29, 2022 to begin the appeal process.

Carefully review the information below to learn more about the appeal process.

How to appealClick to Expand Accordion

For instrument decisions published on or after June 1, 2021, please refer to the updated instructions for information on how to appeal a decision.

Appeal process for decisions published before June 1, 2021

If you’re an Ontario resident, you can start the process to appeal this instrument decision.

First, you’ll need to seek leave (i.e. get permission) from the relevant appellate body to appeal the decision.

If the appellate body grants leave, the appeal itself will follow.

Seek leave to appeal

To seek leave to appeal, you need to do these three things:

  1. prepare your application
  2. provide notice to the minister
  3. mail your application to three parties

1. Prepare your application

You’ll need to prepare an application. You may wish to include the following things in your application:

  1. A document that includes:
    • your name, phone number, fax number (if any), and/or email address
    • the ERO number and ministry reference number (located on this page)
    • a statement about whether you are a resident in Ontario
    • your interest in the decision, and any facts you want taken into account in deciding whether you have an interest in the decision
    • the parts of the instrument that you’re challenging
    • whether the decision could result in significant harm to the environment
    • the reason(s) why you believe that no reasonable person – having regard to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind – could have made the decision
    • the grounds (facts) you’ll be using to appeal
    • the outcome you’d like to see
  2. A copy of the instrument (approval, permit, order) that you you are seeking leave to appeal. You’ll find this in the decision notice on the Environmental Registry
  3. Copies of all supporting documents, facts and evidence that you’ll be using to appeal
What is considered

The appeal body will consider the following two questions in deciding whether to grant you leave to appeal:

  1. is there is good reason to believe that no reasonable person, with respect to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind, could have made the decision?
  2. could the decision you wish to appeal result in significant harm to the environment?

2. Provide your notice

You’ll need to provide notice to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks that you’re seeking leave to appeal.

In your notice, please include a brief description of the:

  • decision that you wish to appeal
  • grounds for granting leave to appeal

You can provide notice by email at minister.mecp@ontario.ca or by mail at:

College Park 5th Floor, 777 Bay St.
Toronto, ON 
M7A 2J3

3. Mail your application

You’ll need to mail your application that you prepared in step #1 to each of these three parties:

  • appellate body
  • issuing authority (the ministry official who issued the instrument)
  • proponent (the company or individual to whom the instrument was issued)

Issuing authority
Mohsen Keyvani
Manager

Environmental Assessment and Permissions Branch
135 St Clair Avenue West
Floor 1
Toronto, ON
M4V 1P5
Canada

416-432-7253

Proponent(s)

GFL Environmental Inc.
39 Fenmar Drive
Toronto, ON
M9L 1L9
Canada


Appellate body

Environmental Review Tribunal
Attention: The Secretary
655 Bay Street
Floor 15
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1E5
(416) 212-6349
(866) 448-2248
OLT.Registrar@ontario.ca

About the Environmental Review Tribunal


Include the following:

ERO number
019-4458
Ministry reference number
6923-C6VGBC

This is not legal advice. Please refer to the Environmental Bill of Rights for exact legal requirements. Consult a lawyer if you need help with the appeal process.

Connect with us

Contact

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice

Original proposal

ERO number
019-4458
Ministry reference number
6923-C6VGBC
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Proposal posted

Comment period

October 14, 2021 - November 28, 2021 (45 days)

Proposal details

This proposal is for an amendment to Environmental Compliance Approval No. A210742 for GFL Environmental Inc. for the use and operation of a non-hazardous hydrocarbon impacted soil processing facility, located in the City of Toronto, Ontario.

The existing approval allows for a maximum of 3,000 tonnes per day and a maximum storage limit of 13,150 tonnes of contaminated and processed soil at any one time.

This amendment is to:

  • consolidate the existing Approvals Nos. A680294 and A680339
  • eliminate the low temperature thermal desorption unit
  • include the property and building located at 39 Fenmar Drive
  • include the transfer ability to receipt, temporarily stored and subsequent transport of non-hazardous soils that cannot be bioremediated
  • include non-hazardous salt and metal impacted soils for receipt at the site
  • include the ability to receive impacted soils from emergency spills pending analysis results
  • increase daily and maximum storage limits to 4,000 tonnes per day, with a maximum of 950,000 tonnes per year, and 40,000 tonnes at any one time
  • update inbound and outbound soil analysis requirements and procedures for treated and outbound soil transfer

The site serves the Province of Ontario and operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

This consultation was open from October 14, 2021
to November 28, 2021

Connect with us

Contact