Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

65824

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hey was just reading the new walleye limits I think you go with your second option can only keep walleyes between 35cm and 44cm or 45cm and one over 70cm I just look how good that slot size has helped out rainy lake for the walleye population I live on rainy lake and have caught so many big walleyes Read more

Comment ID

68378

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe in science and if this will help ensure the future of this excellent fishery in the border waters of the US and Canada; and as an American who's been fishing there for almost 60 years; I support your efforts. We fish in and around Falcon Island, to include Tug Channel, primarily. Read more

Comment ID

69613

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If I have to pick an option it would be option 2. However I don’t understand why the MNRF can’t just implement the same regulation on the lake of the woods as has been utilized for many years on the Winnipeg river system. It is basically the same fisheries. Read more

Comment ID

70159

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How can you have a fishery to the south (Rainy) with a 35 - 45 cm slot and one to the north with a 35 - 45 cm slot (Winnipeg River) and the one in the middle is different!!!!??? And yet all 3 are part of the same watershed/body and are all part of the same fishery. What a joke! Read more

Comment ID

71121

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We fully support a 2 walleye limit, but it needs to be FMZ wide, else the small and medium size walleye lakes will be decimated even more than they currently are. Also, there should be zero walleye harvested over 18-inches. And we can’t wait any longer to do this. It needs to be immediate.

Comment ID

71332

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have been fishing on Lake of the Woods quite often in the last 7 years and for most of my lifetime before that. I think the fishery is very strong on the main lake in the north half. I don’t understand why we would go to a 2 fish limit. If I thought that was the case then I would be all for it. Read more