Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

61803

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Moving broader public sector (BPS) energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting from its current bespoke reporting portal to Portfolio Manager (PM) will provide reporters, the government of Ontario, its agencies and other interested parties with standardized and comparable information. Read more

Comment ID

61814

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, If moving to Energy Star I believe it would be important to add additional building types or categories as needed to be able to accurately reflect the types of buildings reported through the BPS. Read more

Comment ID

68392

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am all for streamlining the reporting. However, I do not wish for my workload to increase significantly to make the lives of the government easier. Therefore, we need to work together so that all involved benefit.

Comment ID

70913

Commenting on behalf of

County of Wellington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We appreciate that the Province is looking to replace the aging sharepoint software with a system that is already widely used in North America. The database associated with Energy Star is a helpful tool for benchmarking similar buildings in similar climates. Read more

Comment ID

73398

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The main concern for annual BPS reporting is the discrepancy of GHG emission factors in the previous year as opposed to reporting via a two-year time lag. Read more