Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

61942

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good Morning: So you think this is a GOOD IDEA ?? Changes Like this would be Disastuious. Mass Majority Government and No OPPISITION . Nobody to say BOO to you or your Government hmmmmmm? I can understand the way you are going. Only seeing one Vision is not Good. Thank You Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

62831

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live in Pickering in the Greenbelt area, proposed for development, I can not afford to move, and can not find anything affordable to rent , let alone buy . We do not need 50,000 more houses or homes that only the very rich can afford. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

63100

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think it's a joke that the Ford government wants to open up protected green spaces for development when there are sites within existing zoning boundaries that could and should be developed to increase density. What an absolute clownshow

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

64447

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to this revocation without any context on a proposal that will take its place. Any new proposals ought to ensure the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve continues to be permanently protected for agricultural and conservation uses.

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

65443

Commenting on behalf of

Region of Durham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No Objection in Principle, subject to transition period. The Central Pickering Development Plan (CPDP) includes 2031 targets for a population of 61,000 residents, and 35,000 jobs within the community of Seaton (and 70,000 residents and 35,000 jobs through long term intensification). Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

65543

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Public services are not developed enough for Durham's growing population. Transit, EMS, schoolboards, hospitals, sanitation, and further are currently requiring more concentrated focus that would be regressed through an increased catchment area. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

65717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support the revocation of the central Pickering development plan. While I appreciate the need for housing for people, this approach will increase sprawl and I see no complementary proposals to address the infrastructure investments that will be required to support housing in these areas. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

67286

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, Leave the regional/municipal development plans alone. They were developed based on how the people that love in the area want their communities to develop. We like our protected lands and intensification corridors the way they are so leave the development plan alone.

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Revocation of the Central Pickering Development Plan

Comment ID

68302

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am deeply disappointed that anyone, let alone my government, would see this as progress. Certainly we are capable of housing our population without destroying the environment that sustains us. Why this shortcut is desirable to anyone other than unimaginative and greedy developers is beyond me.

Related actions