Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

67903

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Why would you spend money ripped up the little environment we have left. We don't need more over priced homes. We need affordable housing. There are lots of buildings that are unused after the Pandemic why not put the money into more affordable housing in those unused buildings.

Comment ID

67927

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. These lands need to be protected and I fact should have been protected years ago to a greater degree. Urban sprawl will nit work if one does nit have food to feed its population. Read more

Comment ID

67939

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This decision overrides a November 2021 vote by Hamiltonian politicians to retain the urban boundaries and not destroy Ontario Greenbelt lands in favour of developer profit. 90 per cent of Hamiltonians favoured holding the boundary and keeping the Greenbelt safe. Read more

Comment ID

67977

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Opening the Greenbelt to developers will be disastrous for the environment and unhelpful to our current housing situation. What we need is high-density, affordable housing for Ontarians - not opening up protected land for unaffordable mansions. Read more

Comment ID

67995

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please save the Greenbelt! This area must be saved for Ontario’s wildlife and nature. We are in a climate crisis and destroying this land for future development is going to only make matters worse. There are a multitude of reasons why we should not develop on the greenbelt. Read more

Comment ID

68001

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose carving up the Greenbelt for use by developers. The proposed swap trading farmland for already-protected areas along rivers is not tenable. The suggestion that these already-protected areas along rivers and streams could be a substitute for valuable farmland is ludicrous. Read more

Comment ID

68009

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt is there to protect wildlife, human life, and nature overall. It's to protect from floods and other natural disasters. It's also beautiful. It is not to be built on. Haven't settlers taken enough away from this land already? Read more

Comment ID

68029

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is a reason the Green Belt was established and protected. Taking away or amending the protections is failing the environment. We are in a climate emergency, the next generations of our children and grandchildren will be inheriting whatever we leave for them. Read more