Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

70382

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
please leave the Greenbelt area as it is. This land needs to be protected and should absolutely NOT be explained by humans. I am truly disappointed in the Ford government to even think about gaining profit from this. please keep the nature as it is

Comment ID

70389

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The greenbelt should be preserved at all costs. There is existing land outside of the greenbelt that can be used for new housing developments. The greenbelt is an essential ecosystem that sustains air and water quality, local food production, biodiversity, and quality of human life for the region. Read more

Comment ID

70390

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose this proposal. It violates the purpose of the Greenbelt which is to permanently protect the lands and waters set aside in the Greenbelt. This was intended to END land speculation on these lands and waters. Read more

Comment ID

70409

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not destroy any more green spaces. We need these protected , not only for people to enjoy but more importantly the biodiversity in the region. Stop being so greedy, its terrible what this government is doing.

Comment ID

70442

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This will not make housing more affordable. It will cause auto dependance, with limited access to services and jobs. Before sprawl is contemplated we should focus within the urban boundary. High rise and low density housing are not the only options.

Comment ID

70448

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Having read the changes I fail to understand or see how these changes improve our housing crisis - builders will continue to build in high cost communities and with no protection of our green belt which will drive the destruction of green belts and increase development in prime pristine land which w Read more

Comment ID

70484

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill is an environmental disaster. We should not be building on wetlands and environmentally sensitive land during a climate crisis. We should not be paving over agricultural land during a period of food insecurity. This is incredibly short sighted. Read more

Comment ID

70564

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Green Belt was created in 2005 to protect agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands from development. In 2022 the Green Belt is still relevant today, individuals, multi-million dollar developers and numbered companies are attempting to permanently alter the landscape of the Green Belt. Read more

Comment ID

70650

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We (three adults in a household in postal code M9N) are against the proposed regulatory change. You have not done your due diligence on the environmental impacts of removing swaths of the greenbelt and developing that land. Read more