Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

83682

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am concerned what this proposal will do to our ground water with 2 streams nearby. Sewage should be disposed of properly, at a treatment facility keeping the safety of humans, livestock, wildlife and plant life a priority.

Comment ID

83691

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against this proposal. I live down stream from this and the integrity of our wells is paramount. We don’t have the option of city water out here and unless you’re going to provide that, this proposal should NOT be approved.

Comment ID

83697

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposing this proposal for the following reasons. This location is situated on prime agricultural land and is surrounded by similar fields, some of which have livestock. There are homes on the surrounding properties which rely on wells for their water supply. Read more

Comment ID

83727

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dwayne Wilson’s proposal to dump raw sewage near my HOME when there is a perfectly (and more environmentally friendly) option at the wastewater treatment plant in London, all because he wants to save time and money for his own private business is ludicrous. Read more

Comment ID

83731

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My thoughts on dumping or spreading human waste is, if one person is aloud. How many more will want to do it? I don't think it is good for the envirement, and it could also do damage to the earth eventaully. Also the water system in the country or rural areas, could also be damaged.

Comment ID

83734

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good afternoon, I would like to express my opinion on the proposal of an [open surface ] spreading of raw, [untreated] human waste/sewage in such a threatening potentially environment irresponsible manner...If the company was proposing a treatment facility with purification capabilities such as num Read more

Comment ID

83738

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a nearby landowner (one road over) and I STRONGLY, STRONGLY oppose to this proposal. I understand Mr. Wilson has to make a living like the rest of us but dumping that waste at the proper treatment facility is simply the cost of doing business. Read more

Comment ID

83746

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
With all the flooding in that area alone ,,, its certain all that waste would have run into the creek,,, were are all the regulation's gone...Glencoe did not want his waste,, Learn from them..... take the waste away to London to be treated properly... Read more

Comment ID

83750

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is an absolute horrible environmental tragedy. The fact that the application is even considered is appalling. I am a neighbour in the area and I do not want to smell untreated sewage or want it anywhere near my animals. Read more

Comment ID

83762

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My husband and I are firmly against this. There is no need other than someone wanting to save money by not responsibly disposing of waste. Facilities are in place to deal with human waste so as to mitigate impacts on land, soil and water . Read more