Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

184872

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The MZO's were useful before but now they are used by large developers to destroy heritage sites and this has to stop so that we can enjoy the deep history that was built and is enjoyed by the citizens of Mississauga. Read more

Comment ID

185067

Commenting on behalf of

City of Brampton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
April 29, 2026 Environmental Registry of Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Subject - 2026 Proposal to revoke the Parkway Belt West Plan, 1978 ERO 026-0229 Read more

Comment ID

185567

Commenting on behalf of

City of Brampton | Integrated City Planning | Transportation Planning

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
City of Brampton Transportation Planning staff (“staff”) acknowledge the role of the Parkway Belt West Plan (PBWP) in protecting infrastructure corridors for transportation, electricity transmission, and open space systems. Read more

Comment ID

185610

Commenting on behalf of

Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation (MSIFN) Consultation Comments on ERO Postings 026-0229 and 026-0230 Proposal to Revoke the Parkway Belt West Plan (1978) and Associated MZOs 1. Introduction Read more

Comment ID

185654

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of DG Group, we support the revocation of the Parkway Belt West Plan. This policy framework is outdated and no longer reflective of current provincial planning objectives, resulting in an unnecessary added layer. Read more

Comment ID

185817

Commenting on behalf of

Enbridge

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Enbridge Inc. and its affiliate companies, including the natural gas utility Enbridge Gas Inc. (collectively referred to as “Enbridge”), appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the Province’s proposal to revoke the Parkway Belt West Plan. Read more

Comment ID

185838

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This area encompasses much of the Oak Ridge Moraine and the Niagara Escarpment. Please preserve this sensitive area. It has a lot of trees, rivers and creeks and a lot of wildlife corridors. This area needs to have parkland.

Comment ID

185922

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on ERO posting 026-0229. Please see attached an electronic submission from the City of Burlington. Below are the key points extracted from the submission, c/o of City's Community Planning Department. Read more

Comment ID

185926

Commenting on behalf of

City of Markham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1) Revoke Parkway Belt West Plan (PBWP) – The intent of the PBWP was to: 1) provide separation and definition of urban area boundaries, 2) create links between urban areas by providing space for movement of people, goods, energy, and information, 3) provide a land reserve for future linear facilitie Read more