Comment
Landscape architects should be explicitly recognized as a prescribed profession. They are regulated, accountable practitioners who routinely prepare core components of planning application submissions, and their work directly informs municipal decision‑making. Excluding landscape architects from the definition of qualified authorities under the “complete application” framework would create unnecessary duplication, delays, added costs, and diffuse accountability across the approvals process.
Regarding the proposed removal of enhanced development standards, the OALA supports Ontario’s objective of accelerating housing delivery. However, Bill 98’s limits on development standards and the removal of “sustainable design” from site plan control would significantly reduce municipalities’ ability to require fundamental climate‑resilient, health‑ and safety‑related site measure, such as stormwater management, tree canopy and shade, and permeable surfaces. Weakening these tools risks higher long‑term public costs, increased exposure to climate‑related impacts, and less coordinated, effective planning outcomes.
Submitted April 29, 2026 1:13 PM
Comment on
Proposed Planning Act, City of Toronto Act, 2006, Building Code Act, 1992 and Municipal Act, 2001 Changes (Schedules 1, 2 and 7 of Bill 98, the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026)
ERO number
026-0300
Comment ID
185047
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status