Commentaire
Landscape architects should be explicitly recognized as a prescribed profession. They are regulated, accountable practitioners who routinely prepare core components of planning application submissions, and their work directly informs municipal decision‑making. Excluding landscape architects from the definition of qualified authorities under the “complete application” framework would create unnecessary duplication, delays, added costs, and diffuse accountability across the approvals process.
Regarding the proposed removal of enhanced development standards, the OALA supports Ontario’s objective of accelerating housing delivery. However, Bill 98’s limits on development standards and the removal of “sustainable design” from site plan control would significantly reduce municipalities’ ability to require fundamental climate‑resilient, health‑ and safety‑related site measure, such as stormwater management, tree canopy and shade, and permeable surfaces. Weakening these tools risks higher long‑term public costs, increased exposure to climate‑related impacts, and less coordinated, effective planning outcomes.
Soumis le 29 avril 2026 1:13 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire, à la Loi de 2006 sur la cité de Toronto, à la Loi de 1992 sur le code du bâtiment et à la Loi de 2001 sur les municipalités (annexes 1, 2 et 7 du projet de loi 98, Loi de 2026
Numéro du REO
026-0300
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
185047
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire