This is clearly the last…

ERO number

013-5018

Comment ID

26277

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

This is clearly the last nail in the coffin of private property ownership and control. The first nail went in when Teranet was set up and took 100% control of all titles (see below).

The people promoting this Conservation Authority takeover of private property are traitors and they are violating all superior human rights laws. But most are lawyers, and that is their role for the past 800 years...to ensure the Vatican controls the world.

Once the sections of the CA Act awaiting proclamation are proclaimed, there will be more warrantless searches (s. 30.2) and stop orders on pretext and s. 30.7 clearly facilitates the complete physical takeover of all private property that started with s. 21. The titles were already taken over through the use of the Land Titles Act in 1994.

S. 21 (1) (b)-(e) -- facilitates the open invasion of private property, and the corporate CA can acquire any personal property they wish by economically sterilizing the property and driving the true owners off their lands, because no one owns their property now -- their property title has been devalued to that of being subject to ANY and ALL interests of Her Majesty.

s. 21 (1) (g) -- allows CA to do anything to further the objectives of the CA which means that CA's will be furthering the UN Agenda 21 which installed itself in 1992 after the signing of the Rio Accord. The UN provided its Municipal Manual, 1994 to all municipalities in 1994-95. The municipalities use the CA to engage in gross violations of human rights under pretext of 'environmental' concerns because the private corporations have owned our titles since 1994 through schemes involving the Land Titles Act.

s. 21 (1) (p) -- gives them the right to research on private property as a pretext for taking constructive possession of the property. Every invasion of privacy and ownership will be 'research'. That is because it is, in title, corporate property.

s. 21 (1) (g) -- under the pretext of 'helping' owners (who are not owners but now merely inhabitants and tenants), they are having them sign documents giving the CA full access to the property in perpetuity...already they are doing this. This is to avoid physical retaliation from the true owners. This is why the corporate government is seeking to restrict gun ownership.

s. 21 (i) (j) -- they are actually creating wetlands where there are none in order to have an excuse to control the property…ditto with 'research' and 'violations'

s. 28 (1) 1. -- now you can't manage your own ponds and ditches on private land and during floods, they will enter your buildings on all sorts of pretexts during an emergency (think Calgary).
2. -- CA creates the wetlands, then restricts your rights to manage that wetland...now it is wide open for more wholesale abuse of private owners who don't know they had already lost their Absolute property titles in 1994.

Absolute Title in law means you are free of all interests of Her Majesty…ALL, including the Planning act and taxation. Qualified Title means you are fully enslaved.

s. 28.1 (1) -- another corporate money grab that violates human rights laws.
s. 28.2 -- makes a person pay to do an activity on their own property that was perfectly lawful and free before the new permit requirements. This is a gross violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which is guaranteed by s. 26 of the Charter and which was upheld as binding by the Supreme Court in Divito v. Canada. In Thomson Newspapers, the Supreme Court held that we owe the corporate governments nothing, nothing, nothing and that what was free before the creation of the monstrosity we are now enslaved by, cannot now be 'licensed, taxed, extorted, etc'. But they are doing it because they keep us focused on political parties instead of our human rights and how to enforce them…we fight among ourselves because everyone wants to be the guru and hero, instead of working with those who have done separate research and actually have the facts.

S. 30.2 -- now every entry will be a warrantless search on the pretext of research, complete with stop orders. But the CA are entering 'their' property, not ours. We are just under the assumption that its our property.

S. 30.7 -- final complete PHYSICAL takeover of all private property. The theft of property titles already happened in 1994 and was completed for 6 million properties in 2004. This all happens because people don't know the difference between legal and lawful.

What people don't know is that in 1994, the UN also took over all property titles by administratively auto-converting our Absolute Titles under the Registry Act to 'qualified title' under the Land Titles Act, without the knowledge or consent of the stakeholders, where Qualified means the property is subject to any and ALL interests of Her Majesty (Her Majesty represents the Crown which represents the Vatican. The UN is privately owned by the Vatican and is its implementation arm.)

Tacit agreement, an important term in law, means that by your silence, you have agreed to the devaluation of your title and conversion of your property to corporate control. So the corporate government is getting our tacit agreement through deception.

But forget going to court…all Judges are appointed by the corporate government and are handpicked for their willingness to serve the UN. In a study of the corruption among those countries where the government appoints the judiciary, Canada ranked 25th or 26th after Pakistan and Argentina as being deep in judicial corruption.

The documentation shows that the provincial corporate government has NO control over our land titles system and can guarantee no property titles. The government is a corporation that used our money to setup another corporation (Teranet), then sold 100% of its shares in Teranet in 2003, and therefore gave up all control, to the holding company that I understand is headquartered in Cyprus.

Teranet is a private corporation that took 100% control of all land titles from the government in 2003 and the 'government' cannot intervene in their decisions.

So the 'legal' takeover of titles started in 1994 and was completed in 2004. The 'physical' control was awaiting the solidification of the legal control and now they will proclaim the 'regulations' to allow total 'physical' control. And they are right on schedule…private property ownership was to end by 2021.