I actively opposes ERO 019…

ERO number

019-0022

Comment ID

31509

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

I actively opposes ERO 019-0022 to reduce minimum distance requirement for placement of bait from rights of way and trails for black bear hunting. I do not agree with this proposal at all. This is a reckless and negligent proposal with repercussions for Ontario citizens and Visitors to this province.

Baiting is not "fair chase" hunting to begin with - nor quite frankly do the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry staff even provide the appropriate governance and inspections and reporting to the public for the outfitters and hunters that use this pathetic method to kill bears. This is killing this is not hunting!

There are significantly more recreationalists such as bird watchers, hikers, dog walkers, photographers, geocachers, and families than hunters or outfitters in the province, many of whom are unfamiliar with hunting and firearm safety protocols who may be put at risk as a result of this move.
Moving bait piles closer to publicly accessible roadways or trails increases the probability of negative encounters between wildlife (of all species who are potentially attracted to the bait piles) and non-hunters or outfitters.
Moving bait piles closer to roadways increases the probability of vehicular collisions with large animals (there are tens of thousands of such incidents, including those causing serious harm to the wildlife, the driver and passengers, vehicles; additionally, this can influence insurance rates and road maintained costs). (Source: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/motorvehiclesafety/tp-tp14798-1289.htm)
As more recreationalists who are not hunters use wild spaces, regulations should be put in place to protect them – not increase the possibility or probability that they will be harmed by hunting and hunting-related activities such as baiting.
Any support for this regulation is support for increasing negative encounters between people and wildlife and puts human and non-human life at risk – hunters and non-hunters alike. I ask that you reject this proposal with prejudice.