20 January 2020 Troy Anthony…

20 January 2020

Troy Anthony
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
70 Foster Drive
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
P6A 6V5

Submitted Online Via the Environmental Registry of Ontario

RE: Overwhelming Support for ERO# 019-1020, Proposed Changes to the Crown Forest Sustainability Act, 1994

Dear Mr. Anthony:

As an Municipality Elected Official in the District of Kenora , I thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Changes to the Crown Forest Sustainability Act (CFSA), Environmental Registry of Ontario number 019-1020.

The whole of Ontario needs an approach to sustainability of our forest and the forestery industry. By sustainable development: environmental, social, economic, along with collaborating on forest management planning and innovation this will ensure it longevity of our forests and continued prosperity for Ontario residents.

With a regional economic impact of approximately half a billion dollars, annually, the forest industry is not only a major contributor to the socio-economic well-being of Northwestern Ontario, but also a large employer and driver of economic growth and prosperity in the Province. The numerous pulp and paper mills, sawmills, wood pellet plants, bio-refinery and woodlands operations make it a major driver of the Ontario economy.

I am writing to you today to express overwhelming support for proposal ERO# 019-1020. Given that the current regulation under the ESA expires this year, I ask that this proposal be approved and finalized as soon as possible. There can be no further delay on this item.

My support for these changes is contingent on the finalized language containing no additional conditions, restrictions, or requirements, beyond what is already contained within the CFSA or O. Reg. 242/08 under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). While removing this duplication is a critical and essential first step, species at risk prescriptions contained within existing forest management guidance continues to limit access to a renewable and sustainable supply of timber.

The CFSA already provides landscape, stand, and site-level direction for managing, conserving, and protecting species at risk. Having two acts attempting to accomplish the same outcome represents the single greatest piece of red tape and duplication to this sector. While a permanent, legislative change to the CFSA is an essential and important first step, in order to unleash the full potential of the sector, improvements need to be made to forest management guidance (e.g. landscape guides and the Forest Management Guide for Conserving Biodiversity at the Stand and Site Scales) delivered under the CFSA.

I understand that MNRF is currently undertaking a review of forest management guidance and manuals and expect the finalized products to:
1. Consider the impacts of climate change on species at risk habitat.
2. Evaluate the cumulative impacts of species at risk policy on a healthy economy.
3. Contribute to functioning ecosystems and working landscapes.
4. Undertake, share, and consider socio-economic impact analysis.

I look forward to working with your government to improve the effectiveness of species at risk policy and ensure a balanced approach between a healthy environment and vibrant economy. This change to the CFSA has the potential to significantly reduce administrative burden, costs, and business uncertainty, while ensuring a continued commitment to the highest standards of sustainable forest management.

I would be happy to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss the best path forward for ensuring positive outcomes with respect to species at risk, and for keeping people in this province working.

Sincerely,

Feedback Signature signed Anonymously to allow for publication