Comment
I am against extending the SSS for SPM for Stelco as proposed. The MECP should impose a much lower limit. Stelco has had this same limit for 10 years and this limit is almost twice as high as that for ArcelorMittal Dofasco. In trying to find out more information about this issue I have also been informed that Stelco has not yet released their 2019 ESDM.
This leads me to think that the MECP did write up this proposal without even being able to review 2019 data to make the final decision. If true this is a much different process than would be mandated for a proper SSS application.
I propose to only extend this SSS for a 3 month period, during which the MECP reviews 2019 data and possibly lowers the limit for SPM for Stelco.
Submitted December 14, 2020 7:23 PM
Comment on
Stelco Inc. - Approval of a site-specific air standard
ERO number
019-2298
Comment ID
50250
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status