Comment
MZO are a blunt instrument overriding climate mitigation efforts, community priorities, official plans and more. There should be a requirement for publicizing each MZO under consideration and broad opportunities for consultation. Any order affecting a watershed, forest corridor, migratory path and more must involve consulting with every community that would be affected along with appropriate experts.
The exclusions need to significantly broadened to include ALL areas protected by land trusts, conservation areas and other areas important for environmental protection, as well as Class A farmland. And of course any significant cultural or heritage area, particularly relating to Indigenous peoples, needs to be explicitly excluded. A No MZO should affect any such areas.
Any advisory group formed by the province should consist of scientists, academics and other experts who have no potential conflict of interest - thus excluding all developers and any group representing developers. Direct and indirect donors to the government in power during its election or while in power must be excluded.
Any proposed major project, such as a new highway, industrial area or residential area, must require a full environmental assessment along with a published business case from the Minister, in consultation with related Ministers. The project must not proceed if the environmental assessment or public review of the business case cannot be supported by independent experts, again with no conflict of interest involving the current government or any party that would financially benefit from approval.
Supporting links
Submitted January 16, 2021 11:39 AM
Comment on
Proposed implementation of provisions in the Planning Act that provide the Minister enhanced authority to address certain matters as part of a zoning order
ERO number
019-2811
Comment ID
50730
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status