2023-02-03 - ERO 019-5228 -…

2023-02-03 - ERO 019-5228 - OPA 524 - Tenblock - 145 St. George

Please refer to attached letter.

RE: ERO Number: 019-5228 – City of Toronto Official Plan Amendment 524 to delineate and
plan for sixteen (16) Protected Major Transit Station Areas

145 St. George Street – Museum, St. George and Spadina PMTSAs

Tenblock is a residential development company that has been building housing for over 65 years. Since the 1950s, our mission has been to provide high-quality housing that enriches life for residents while contributing to complete and healthy communities. Our current generation of development projects is adding over 6000 units across the City of Toronto. Our projects focus on delivering high quality housing that fulfills the City of Toronto’s long-term city building goals and satisfies the tenets of good planning.

We are writing to submit our comments regarding the proposed Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 524 which seeks to establish sixteen Protected Major Transit Station Areas in downtown Toronto. We own and have active development planning applications for the property located at 145 St. George Street which is located within three overlapping PMTSAs: the Museum, St. George and Spadina PMTSAs. OPA 524 designates the subject site with a minimum floor space index (FSI) density of 1.5. Other adjacent minimum densities are only set as high as 3.0. In our opinion the proposed FSIs set by the City for all downtown PMTSAs are too low and ought to be increased.

Our project at 145 St. George Street is located just north (within 150 metres) of the intersection of Bloor and St. George. The project is designed to comprehensively support multi-modal transportation given its location in the heart of downtown.

The development proposal (from the original May 2021 submission) consists of a new building at 29 storeys with a 7-storey podium. It proposes to add 341 homes to the community, of which a minimum of 130 units would be rental replacement homes. The current proposed density is a floor space index (FSI) of 10.01.

In our opinion, the proposed FSIs set by the City for these PMTSAs are too low and ought to be increased to more realistic values for the following reasons:

Establishing higher minimum density values will greatly assist both the City and applicants in justifying new and existing planning applications which seek increased heights and density within the downtown core. Within the realm of planning applications, minimum density values can unfortunately be interpreted as what may be appropriate for a given site and proposals that greatly exceed these minimums (as is now a given for downtown sites), can subjectively be seen as “excessively” dense/tall, which may not objectively be the case.

The requirements of Inclusionary Zoning are a public benefit but delivered at private cost. There is no doubt that Inclusionary Zoning requirement will have an impact on financial viability of redeveloping certain sites. Establishing higher minimum densities will only help incentivize redevelopments that must also contend with Inclusionary Zoning requirements along with other variables, often including rental replacement obligations.

We strongly promote that the proposed FSIs set by the City for all downtown PMTSAs are too low and ought to be increased to better reflect the current reality of development applications in the downtown core. Redevelopment proposals add significant amounts of new housing, commercial and institutional/community space, increase density, and make better use of existing infrastructure and public investment.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding our submissions.
Sincerely,
Evan Perlman, MCIP, RPP
Senior Development Manager
Tenblock
416-322-4111
eperlman@tenblock.ca