Comment
Some worthwhile online reference sites to read about hard lessons learned regarding this topic from other jurisdictions
www.mdpi.com/journal/recycling - specifically their article "Assessment of Public Opposition to Construction and Demolition Waste Facilities: A Case Study in Australia"
www.sciencedirect.com - Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2016 "Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues"
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233626/ - Waste Incineration & Public Health, Chapter 7 "Social Issues and Public Interactions"
Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment - "GUIDE FOR IDENTIFYING, EVALUATING AND
SELECTING POLICIES FOR INFLUENCING CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION AND DEMOLITION
WASTE MANAGEMENT" - 2019
www.ejnet.org/ej/ - Environmental Justice Network - Cerrell Associates Report to California Waste Management Board: "Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting"
- advice and demographic criteria that waste facility proponents should use when making their selection of a Waste-to-Energy site that will tend to offer the least amount of political resistance and local public opposition to the project.
Submitted March 28, 2024 8:06 AM
Comment on
Proposed designation under the Environmental Assessment Act of the landfill site and waste transfer and processing expansion, located in the Municipality of Chatham-Kent
ERO number
019-8417
Comment ID
97611
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status